No, first off the Thirty Year War was fought in central Europe and it started as a fight between protestants, mostly Calvinists and the Church but degraded into a war between France and the Hapsburgs who ruled the Holy Roman Empire, and both France and the Hapsburgs were Catholic. In Ireland, after the vicious suppression of Elizabeth I and there are no words to describe the horror under Cromwell, Catholics were completely disenfranchised, their property and livelihood was stolen from them by the English and they were forbidden to even speak their own language much less worship God. As horrible and dreadful as it all was, it had nothing to do with the Thirty Years War, and the Catholics were in no position to "fight" for control, they were just trying to survive.
the protestant majority wanted to remain a part of great britian, while the catholics minority wanted to unify with the republic of Ireland.
There is no specific year when Roman Catholics definitively declared they were right and Anglicans were wrong. The split between the Roman Catholic Church and Anglicanism occurred gradually over centuries, with theological and political differences contributing to the division. The official break between the two occurred in the 16th century during the Reformation period, with each side claiming theological validity.
Catholics and Muslims
Unionists fear played a big part, they wanted to be the majority in Northern Ireland, and the Unionist politicians stoked sectarian hatred for years. Protestants thought that Catholics were a threat to the state, but in reality if Catholics had been treated as equals Republicans would never have got the support that they did get and the troubles may never have happened.
No. Ireland did not have a King during his lifetime. Ireland was under British control and Britain had 3 kings in his lifetime. Daniel O'Connell was never the king of England.
the protestant majority wanted to remain a part of great britian, while the catholics minority wanted to unify with the republic of Ireland.
During the 1800s, there were issues of conflict between Roman Catholics and Protestants. Some of them were violent. However, there were great revivals among the Protestants at that time.
The pale was the part of Ireland that was directly under the control of the English government. It covered most of the county of Dublin and also parts of Kildare, Meath and Louth.
Yes they could. The problem was that there was discrimination in how people could vote, leaving Protestants with more votes than Catholics. For example, people with businesses or property, which were mainly Protestants, had more votes given to them than those without.
Philadelphia in the 1600s was primarily influenced by Quakerism due to the arrival of Quakers led by William Penn. However, as the colony expanded, various religious groups like Anglicans, Baptists, and Lutherans settled in the area as well. Religious freedom was a core principle in Pennsylvania, leading to a diverse religious landscape in Philadelphia during that period.
Conserve
The Protestants in Northern Ireland didn't mind much as hardly any Protestants were arrested. Internment was entirely biased and one-sided, with 98% of all those arrested Catholics. Catholic were 100% opposed to internment and fierce rioting swept the country as British soldier arrived to arrest people. The Catholics were generally mistreated during their arrests and so internment was not popular among Northern Irish Catholics. Some people who were interned are still bitter about it to this day.