0
This requires a person to know the mind of the President. We know that he was factually incorrect, but in order to "lie", the person lying needs to know that the information was factually incorrect at the time he makes it. I personally believe that the President wanted a reason to invade Iraq so badly (to make up for his father's "mistake" of not overthrowing Saddam Hussein), that he did not question the faulty evidence provided him and wanted to believe it. As a result, I believe that Bush actually believed his incorrect statement to be true, which means that he was not lying.
What else can I help you with?
What is the current war in Iraq being fought over?
The current "War in Iraq" is being fought, because Saddam Hussein had some weapons of mass destruction or (WMDs) that he wouldn't destroy, also George Bush accused him of having connections with terrorists.
Why bush Saddam?
The phrase "Bush Saddam" typically refers to the actions taken by President George W. Bush regarding Saddam Hussein, the former president of Iraq. The U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 was primarily justified by the Bush administration on the grounds that Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and posed a threat to global security. The invasion also aimed to promote democracy in the region, but the absence of found WMDs led to significant controversy and debate about the legitimacy and motives behind the war. Ultimately, the conflict had profound and lasting impacts on Iraq and U.S. foreign policy.
What is an example of a just war?
the iraq war as no WMDs were found.
Does bush like pie?
no he acused it of having wmds and invaded it
Why did congress authorize bush to invade Iraq?
Congress authorized President George W. Bush to invade Iraq in 2002 primarily based on concerns about Iraq's alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and its ties to terrorist organizations, particularly in the wake of the September 11 attacks. The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution asserted that Iraq posed a threat to the United States and its allies. Additionally, the Bush administration argued that the invasion was necessary to enforce United Nations resolutions and promote democracy in the region. Ultimately, the decision was contentious and has been the subject of extensive debate regarding its justification and consequences.
Why does the us invade Iraq in 2003?
The U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 primarily based on the belief that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) that posed a threat to international security. The Bush administration also cited Iraq's alleged ties to terrorist organizations, particularly Al-Qaeda, and the desire to promote democracy in the Middle East as justifications for the invasion. However, the failure to find WMDs after the invasion led to significant controversy and debate regarding the legitimacy of the war.
Which of following is one of the reasons that the US invaded Iraq in 2003?
One of the reasons the US invaded Iraq in 2003 was the belief that the Iraqi government, led by Saddam Hussein, possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) that posed a threat to international security. The Bush administration argued that these WMDs could potentially be used against the US or its allies. Additionally, there was a desire to promote democracy in Iraq and the broader Middle East as part of a strategic vision following the events of September 11, 2001.
What was the reason for US intervention in the region in the Iraq war?
The official reason that the president (George Bush) gave was that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, or nuclear weapons, that were potentially harmful to the USA. The unofficial reason was that America had had enough of Saddam Hussein and wanted him out of government.
Why did georye bush start the war?
Afghanistan- Supposedly because of al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden being in Afghanistan. Iraq- Supposedly because of WMDs (did not exist) and Saddam Husseins cruelty. This is very debated but these are the official reasons.
Why do Republicans think Bill Clinton should have been impeached for lying about his infidelity and George Bush should go Scott free after misleading the world on Iraq?
Clinton was impeached for obstruction of justice, not for lying about his infidelity. You or I would have gone to prison for a few years for lying on the witness stand. Bush's 'lies' about Iraq were the same ones the democrats were telling during the Clinton administration. See the related question at http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_George_Bush_lie_about_the_WMDs_in_Iraq to read the quotes from prominent democrats (including both Clintons) about Saddam's WMDs.
What real reason did George Bush have for invading Iraq?
President Bush gave Saddam Hussein an ultimatum: Either provide definitive proof of disposal of weapons of mass destruction, or else resign as leader (dictator) of the country. He did neither. Accordingly, Congress authorized the use of force should Hussein not comply. Virtually every congressman and other high ranking official in America and indeed throughout the world thought that Hussein still had WMDs. Hussein's downfall stopped the official tyranny in Iraq. Unfortunately terrorists still are causing widespread mayhem, not only in Iraq, but throughout the world.
How did the US originally justify the irag war?
They claimed that Iraq was in possession of weapons of mass destruction, they also made insinuations that they were involved in harboring terrorists . all of this was later proved to be a fabrication.
