To be logical, Hinduism should have been the first as there is no trace / evidence for its initiation. But Buddhism, everybody knows that the followers of Gauthama Budha are 'Buddhist'. Buddha lived and taught in the northeastern Indian subcontinent some time between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE.
It cannot be told, that the existence of the Hinduism is unbelievable (as answered by the previous user - answer edited) just because there is no trace of initiation of the Religion. There are evidence for existence of the religion in history.
Yes, budhism derived from Hinduism
No. It was the other way around. Buddha was Hindu. Hinduism came before Buddhism.
No Buddhism was established about 500 BCE. Hinduism has roots going back several thousand years before that.
Buddhism and Hinduism.
Buddhism was founded by the Buddha, and nobody knows who founded Hinduism.
Hinduism, Buddhism, and some smaller religions such as Zoroastrianism.
Hinduism
Hinduism and Buddhism agree that a person life on earth is
Hinduism
It was made up of warring states, Buddhism, and Hinduism
There is no similarity between Buddhism and Hinduism though both of them are originated from India. Main difference is Hinduism believes in existence of God while Buddhism dont.
None. Hinduism and Buddhism share no sacred texts.
Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism