0
Did Jesus affirm he was the messiah in his trial with Caiaphas?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
The story of Jesus' trial before Caiaphas evolved a little, as it was passed from Mark's Gospel, where it was first written, to Matthew and Luke, then finally to John.
In Mark's Gospel, only outsiders call Jesus the Son of God, and Jesus never refers to himself as the Messiah or Christ until the trial, otherwise calling himself the Son of Man. When Peter calls him the Christ (Mark 8:29), Jesus charged that they tell no one of this. Clearly the reader was intended to know that Jesus was the Christ, without the gospel being cast as blasphemous at this early stage in Christian history. At his trial, the high priest challenges Jesus as to whether is is the Messiah, to which Jesus says, "I am," after which he appears to digress and speak of the Son of Man. Jesus has affirmed that he was the Messiah.
The Gospels of Matthew and Luke based their accounts of the trial on this passage in Mark, but neither has Jesus say, "I am," so possibly this was not present in the very early copies of Mark they had, with his only answer being about the Son of Man. This would be consistent with Mark's caution not to offend the Jews at this earlier stage in Christian history.
In Matthew's Gospel, when Caiaphas asks that Jesus tell whether he is the Christ (Messiah), the Son of God, Jesus merely says, "Thou hast said," then speaks of the Son of Man. He has left it to the high priest to reach his own conclusion.
In Luke's Gospel, Jesus' reply is, "If I tell you, you will not believe," and then he speaks of the Son of Man.
The author of John's Gospel realised that the Sanhedrin would never try a man on a criminal charge during the hours of darkness, so instead of a formal trial, Jesus is simply taken to the houses of Annas and the Caiaphas. In this account, Caiaphas does not ask Jesus whether he is the Messiah, but instead asks Jesus to explain his doctrine and Jesus' answer makes it clear to the reader that Jesus was entirely innocent of any offence against Judaism. Jesus is not given the opportunity to assert that he is the Messiah, and does not do so.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did Jesus affirm the importance of using reason?
He kept quite through out his trial. This was a good use of reasoning.
Who was the high priest who accused Jesus of blasphemy?
In A.D. 33 Joseph Caiaphas was the high priest of the Jews of whom accused Jesus of blasphemy, '...this man has blasphemed against God', as seen in the Acts of Pilate, of which contains the reports of that period of time, found and translated by Ananias.
Who are the four people who presided over Jesus' trial?
The New Testament says that Jesus was taken to the high priest Annas who then sent him to the high priest Caiaphas. He was then sent to Pontius Pilate to be prosecuted for claiming to be the King of Jews.
Where in the Bible is the trial of Jesus before the Sanhedrin?
A:The trial of Jesus before the Sanhedrin is in the synoptic gospels: Matthew 26:57-66, Mark 14:53-64, Luke 22:66-71. In Matthew and Mark, the trial takes place soon after Jesus is arrested at midnight, but in Luke the priests wait until daybreak, since the Sanhedrin would never have met during hours of darkness to try Jesus. John's Gospel does not have a trial before the Sanhedrin, but has Jesus taken first to the house of Annas, father-in-law to the high priest, who interrogated him alone. Then Jesus was taken to the house of the high priest, Caiaphas, who again interviewed Jesus alone.
Why was Jesus taken to the Sanhedrin after his arrest?
Jesus was taken to the Sanhedrin after his arrest because the Jewish religious leaders wanted to question him about his teachings and perceived blasphemous claims. They sought to find evidence to charge him with crimes punishable by Roman law.
Where did they take Jesus on Friday Morning?
The synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) say that they took Jesus to the Sanhedrin for trial at 3:00 o'clock in the morning, then to Pontius Pilate at 6:00 o'clock. After his trial, he was taken to Calvary for crucifixion and placed on the cross at 9:00 o'clock.John's Gospel is in basic agreement, but the author recognised that the Sanhedrin would never have met during hours of darkness to try Jesus, resolving this by eliminating the first trial and merely having Jesus taken separately before Annas and then Caiaphas, before being taken to Pontius Pilate.
Where was Jesus taken first for his trial?
His first trial was by Annas and then the High Priest Caiaphas after being sent to him by Annas - Caiaphas' father-in-law. This took place in the courtyard of the High Priest's house near the temple precincts. Next he was sent to the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, in his palace within the walls of the city. Realising that Jesus was innocent he passed the buck to Herod, the puppet King, as Jesus was a Galilean and therefore under Herod's jurisdiction. So the next trial took place in Herod's palace. Unfortunately for the religious leaders the death sentence was permitted only with the permission of Pilate. Finally Jesus was sent back to Pilate at his palace for the trial that would result in his crucifixion.
How many trials did Jesus have and how long did each last?
Mark's Gospel, followed by Matthew and Luke, says that the betrayal and arrest of Jesus occurred at the darkest hour - midnight. Jesus was led away for a trial before the high priest and other senior priests and elders at 3am in the morning. Jesus was then led away for a second trial by Pontius Pilate "when it was morning', at 6am. Mark says that it was "the third hour" - 9 am - when they crucified him. So, there were two trials and each trial must have taken something less than three hours.Notwithstanding that, it was the practice in compliance with the Torah not to sit in judgement except in the light of day. John's Gospel resolves this problem by not having a formal trial by the Sanhedrin, simply having Jesus brought first to Annas, then to Caiaphas, before being taken to Pontius Pilate. So, John's Gospel has only one trial of Jesus.
Jesus was crucified under which high priest?
Jesus was first taken to the former High Priest, Annas (John 18:13) who was also the father of Caiaphas, the High Priest at that time. It was to Caiaphas's house where Jesus was taken next. This fact is found in Matthew 26:57
Who was the criminal that was released at the trial of Jesus?
Barabbas was the criminal that was released at the trial of Jesus.
What were the major reason the leaders of Israel wanted to kill Jesus?
Jesus was sentenced to death not by some unknown "leaders of Israel", but by the religious leaders of the Roman Province Judah. The reasons why both Jewish religious leaders, especially the High Priest of the Temple Caiaphas, and the Roman appointed Governor of Judea Pontius Pilate sentenced Jesus to death were quite evident. Jesus was causing trouble in Jerusalem. He was a known rebel and he was endangering public peace at a time when large and volatile crowds were thronging the city to celebrate the Passovedr. It was entirely reasonable to arrest him.But what happened after the arrest was not legal. Caiaphas rigged the trial.First, Caiaphas took on the usually incompatible roles of chief judge and prosecuting lawyer.But that was not all.Scholars know the rules that applied to Jewish trials at that period and the trial of Jesus broke many of those rules:It was at night - Jewish trials had to take place during the dayIt took place on a feast day - this was not allowedIt took place in Caiaphas's house - it should have been conducted in the council chamberThe trial went wrong for Caiaphas. He needed to prove that Jesus had threatened to destroy the Temple, which would have been both treason and an offence against God. But the witnesses couldn't agree on what Jesus had said. So that charge failed.Caiaphas decided to see if he could induce Jesus to utter blasphemy.He asked Jesus, point blank, "Are you the Son of God, the Son of the Blessed? Are you The Messiah?"The Gospels vary a little, and only in Mark's account does Jesus answer that he is.It's enough. Caiaphas announces that Jesus has spoken blasphemy. The rest of the Court agree. Jesus deserves the death sentence.Just one problem; the court didn't have the power to execute people. And that's where the Romans come into the story.Actually, there are two problems: blasphemy against the God of Jews was not a crime under Roman Law, and unless Caiaphas could think of something better, it might not be enough to persuade the Romans to execute Jesus.But at this moment the interests of Pontius Pilate came into play.Pilate was desperate to keep the peace. His career in the Roman Empire depended on his running the province smoothly and efficiently.He had 6,000 soldiers on hand to keep the peace in a city bulging with 2.5 million Jews. The religious authorities, whose cooperation he needed for a quiet life, wanted him to execute Jesus and there was an angry mob baying for Jesus' blood.To release Jesus would have been likely to cause a riot; Pilate could have lost control of the city, and possibly the province.Pilate sacrificed Jesus to preserve Roman rule and his own career.
What are the release dates for Inside - 2007 Inside a Cult Messiah on Trial 3-11?
Inside - 2007 Inside a Cult Messiah on Trial 3-11 was released on: USA: 17 May 2009
