The LCD takes much LESS energy than a CTR.
CRT is cheaper than LED.
LCD projector televisions are more reliable than CRT televisions in numerous ways. There sizes are comparable but the pictures and the way you will view everything isn't. Get the one that you think has the best picture.
At this point, I would say that a CRT had no advantages over a LCD monitor. The LCD is probably cheaper, it takes up less space, is easier on the eyes, and provides better revolutions.
LCD monitors are NOT faster than CRT's, CRT images move at the speed of light and have almost no input lag. LCDs have input lag and this is why good ones are so expensive.
In my opinion, the LCD definitely is better than the CRT, based on the simple fact of clarity and color. While CRT is less expensive than an LCD, it also causes increased eyestrain when viewing a computer screen for a long period of time.
It is cheaper than a LCD monitor.
Theoretically they should but CRT's have been around for more than three quarters of a century (though few of those oldies are still in use) LCD's have only bee around for a decade and a half or so.
32 inch tv is worse quality than 27inch because the pixals have to spread out more try sitting further away. As for the CRT better than LCD that seems to happen to me but watching in HD is much better than CRT.
CRT: Use more power, lower resolution LCD flat screen: price
There are: CRT monitors (those fat monitors) and LCD monitors (flat screens)
As LCD display technology improves, it now beats CRT for clarity and image stability. CRT based computer monitors are no longer mass produced and existing CRT monitors are usually several years old. As they age, the image becomes softer so there will be few CRT displays that can compare with a modern LCD screen.