Violent
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi advocated non-violent protest.
Non violent protest is working for a cause, not just accepting the situation, like passivism.
He initially believed in nonviolent resistance, but eventually decided that violent protest was necessary to end racial oppression.
violent methods wheras Martin Luther Kings had peaceful and non-voilent methods they both had the same goal but a different method to achieve it =]=]
The title "Civil Disobedience" suggests that Thoreau's methods of protest involve breaking laws or regulations that are seen as unjust or oppressive, but in a nonviolent and conscientious way. Thoreau believed in using peaceful resistance to challenge authority and bring attention to social injustices.
violent protest is like the suffragettes they used violence to get what they wanted and nonviolent is where you use powers of persuasion to get your way and not to use violence.
They used nonviolent methods of civil disobedience.
He did abandon non-violent protest as it was not working out
violent protest are protest which were very violent
India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.
well im not sure really working on it though...lol
No, they were completely non violent.