0
well im not sure really working on it though...lol
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did gandhi change his stance on non-violent protest after the amritsar massacre?
no.
Is non violent protest a powerful way to bring about change?
Yes, but there is a proviso - for this to work there MUST be a free press to report the protest. If there is no free press then the protest is not know to the people and is irrelevant.
How would you describe the sit-in movement?
The "Sit-In" movement (of the 1960's - where it became popular) was a type of political protest started by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. A type of peaceful resistance using masses of people to effect political change in a non-violent confrontation.
Would using Martin Luther King's pacifist approach to resolving conflict work today against the US actions in the middle east?
It depends on where the protest occurred. If it occurs in the Middle East, it would have no shot of working. Non-violence does not work against a militarized opponent with no worry of "looking bad" to the public. If it occurs in the United States it may have some effect, but non-violent protest alone is not enough to change political policy. There must also be a political and economic push to coincide with the protests to achieve political change.
What is a non political revolution?
non-violent and change the way people live and think
Who advocate social economic and political change for African American with the the ballot or the bullet speech?
Malcolm X
Who advocated social economic and political change for African Americans with this the ballot or the bullet speech?
Malcolm X
Who is advocated social economic and political change for African Americans with his the ballot or the bullet speech?
Malcolm X
Which of the following describes how Nelson Mandela's view on protesting apartheid change over time?
He initially believed in nonviolent resistance, but eventually decided that violent protest was necessary to end racial oppression.
Why do you think Malcolm X believed in Violent protest?
Violent v Non- Violent ProtestIn this essay, I will talk about comparing Violent and non- violent protests and which is better to start a protest and how it affects people and if it's worth starting one.People usually protest because they think it's not fair on them or anyone else or they could just simply protest because they don't like the change or the new thing. For example the 2011 London riots which broke out because the death of Mark Duggan who was shot dead by police, this started out as a peaceful protest then suddenly everyone joined in and it became a very violent protest on the London streets.Other protesters like Gandhi or Martin Luther King protested about that they would like to make everybody equal and stop racism in a nonviolent wayThe main characteristics of non- violent protests are like Gandhi and Martin Luther King who believed that the whole world should be equal and there was no racism to black or white or just because there religions or where they came from. They both didn't protest with any violence they just wanted everyone to be treated fairly and they wouldn't stop until they get it right.The main different between the 2 forms of protests are that violent protests always lead to fights/battles with injury's or maybe even deaths, and non- violent protests are really just like a group of people with posters or just trying to get people to listen to them with no violence For example Gandhi and Martin Luther King who made a peaceful protest about how they wanted everyone to be equal and be treated the same.The main advantages of violent protests are that you could make someone change their minds by threatening to do something to them like hurt them or something but on the other hand the disadvantages of violent protest are that there is mostly someone or something gets hurt, damaged or even killed. This could lead to war or a massive battle that could hurt a lot of people because of 1 little thing that could have been sorted out in a peaceful way.The main advantages of non- violent protest are that no one gets hurt or killed and that no one is going to be really affected by the protest which means peace to everyone involved. On the other hand the disadvantages of non- violent protests are that sometimes they might not listen to you as all what you are doing is just waiting outside or putting up posters and banners or just getting followers to try to get people's attention.A person may resort to violent methods because they might have tried a peaceful protest but it didn't make no changes s they might think to get their attention they would create a violent protest to get their attention or to make them think what they could do.A person may believe in staying in a peaceful protest because they might not want to create war or get anyone hurt or killed so they keep to a peaceful protest. Also they might believe it's not worth it having a violent protest as it could make the situation worse.Overall I believe that you should start a peaceful protest so that no one else is hurt or killed.
What effect did Mohandas Gandhi have on the world?
He showed that there were different ways to protest and non violent means to change a government . He served as an example for men like MLK.
Malcolm X advocated social economic and political change for African Americans by what means?
All of the above. (Go Apex Kids;)
