No. The Bible was entirely writtencertainly before 200 AD, long before Shakespeare was born. The King James Translation of the Bible was first published during Shakespeare's lifetime, but Shakespeare had nothing to do with it. Hehad only a grammar school education and was not a cleric andso would under no circumstances have been called upon to help with the project.Nor is the text in any wayconsistent with his writing style, although it is also in Early Modern English. For example,Shakespeare's works exhibit a huge vocabulary of some 36,000 words, whereas the King James Bible uses only about 8,000. Although the translation is beautiful, it does not sound like Shakespeare.
William Shakespeare did not write anything in the King James version of the bible.
They were written at approximately the same time.
Except to the extent that Shakespeare knew that he couldn't write anything which might criticize the monarch, since people who wrote those kinds of things went to jail, the king and queen had no influence on Shakespeare's writing.
Yes. He did. Besides writing, he did lots of acting, raised a family...Oh it is so hard to keep track of William Shakespeare.
Shakespeare wrote in poetry, even when he was writing plays.
Before Shakespeare began writing plays he was an actor.
A quill pen was the writing implement of choice in Shakespeare's day.
Nothing. Shakespeare started writing before Marlowe died.
Most of Shakespeare's writing is in English. There's also some French.
Writing was not Shakespeare's only career, and probably not his first.
The first reference to anything written by Shakespeare is by Thomas Greene in 1592, who parodies the line "A tyger's heart wrapp'd in a woman's hide" from Part 3 of Henry VI. Greene does not actually mention the play. Shakespeare was not credited with writing anything until Venus and Adonis was published in 1593. Quarto editions of his plays started to appear in 1594.
That there are no Shakespeare writing samples. The only example of his penmanship we have is his signature on several documents. As with deVere, his signature changes every time. This does not suggest that they were the same person, only that people back then did not develop a single consistent signature or a single consistent spelling of their name. Basically, writing samples do not tell us anything about Shakespeare or Oxford for that matter.