Want this question answered?
yes in the late 1800s ther were two African Americans in the Alamo
The thesis of the Declaration of Independence states that any people who are being abused or oppressed by their government has the right and duty to overthrow it and create a new one in its place. It also states that the citizens of America have undergone such abuse by the British government to make it necessary to fight for independence.
Because the Netherlands were very wealthy, there was not a lot of incentive for Dutch settlers to come to the New World. As a result, the inhabitants of the colony tended to be English. When the British decided to claim New Netherlands, The Duke of York launched a war flotilla to capture it. There simply weren't enough Dutch citizens who were willing to fight to defend the colony, so it was taken without any bloodshed.
The fundamental issue is that Britain did not recognize the American citizenship of former British subjects. The British argued that once a person is a British subject (usually by birth in Britain), that person remains a British subject in perpetuity and cannot shed that citizenship by becoming a naturalized American citizen. As a result, the British navy felt that any former Briton on an American ship was dodging his duty to participate in the defense of his country (the UK) against Napoleonic France. As is the case with any draft dodger, they should be brought and forced to serve. Of course, the US government objected since it considered these individuals to be US citizens and not UK citizens.
San Antonio, Texas, but the Alamo was not in any position to defend the city (which Mexican troops occupied as soon as they arrived) as the question imples.
if any, they were American, Canadian or British citizens
Citizens of Eire have exactly the same rights in Britain as British citizens and as such can vote in parliamentary elections and stand for election to parliament.
yes in the late 1800s ther were two African Americans in the Alamo
Because they were patriotic and didn't know any better.
The thesis of the Declaration of Independence states that any people who are being abused or oppressed by their government has the right and duty to overthrow it and create a new one in its place. It also states that the citizens of America have undergone such abuse by the British government to make it necessary to fight for independence.
He was empowered by the British crown to fight any force that threatened the East India Company's power in India.
The reason for the Alamo happening in 1836 is because that was the time they decided to fight, and freedom from Mexico is why. Back then, Texas was part of Mexico. They wanted freedom from Mexico, which means they wanted to be independent like most of the north eastern states. This was a little bit before 1836. They started planning . They had a battle a few years before for there freedom from mexico. They lost, and then the battle of the Alamo came in.
They do have a connection to the British Empire - so much so, that they're even one of the 16 Commonwealth Dominions which acknowledge the British Monarch as their Head of State.
No, W. H. Auden did not fight in any war. He was a British poet and playwright known for his works that explored themes of love, politics, and social issues.
I know there was something about the Alamo
Yes, In San Antonio you have the Alamo.
There have never been any British people who have landed on the moon yet, all 12 Apollo astronauts were American citizens.