Well, it's a fact that King Arthur was an actual person, however, his power might have been exaggerated. But yes, the King of England did meet King Arthur.
King Arthur is a legend, not an actual King of old.
How did all the stories of King Arthur when he was born get changed throughout history?
In the history of king Arthur he finds a competition to pull a sword out of a stone. He pulled out the sword and he named it Excalibur.
King Arthur never realy existed in English history, and all tales about him are not true.
King Arthur and his knights... get a history book.
That would depend on whether you believe king Arthur actually existed. His place in "history" is that of a legend, and if he did exist, he was King of only a small area of England.
king arthur live about 22464years ago hello people.
a legend is a story about something that has been embellished. so i would have to say yes, because there are actual written records of king arthur
King Arthur and Mordread killed each other on the battle field. Mordread actually died before Arthur as Arthur had one of the most protracted and dramatic deaths in history.
King Arthur of Camelot is a major part of Medieval History. Historians have been unable to accurately verify if King Arthur actually existed. Records regarding the Knights of the Round Table and King Arthur’s coronation have varied drastically.
2004 sir .
the treatment of king Arthur is suitable for a legendary king because he was a well known man to many people