No the ANZACs were the combined Australian and New Zealand Army Corps first used in 1915 in World War 1 in Gallipoli fighting the Turks (Ottoman Empire allied to the Central powers). The name was used for other combined formations during World War 1, 2 and the Vietnam War. So about 130 years too late to fight in the war you refer to (1775-1783). James Cook was only mapping what is New South Wales in Australia and New Zealand in 1770.
world war 1
The American Revolution
The Second War for American Independence was in 1812. The war was a fight with the British along with their Indian allies.
the ANZACs were said that a courageous image, to go to war and fight for the freedom of the world.
In WWI,WWII and the Korean war. ~A45
because they all were proud to fight in the war
No. ANZAC stands for Australia and New Zealand Army Corps. The ANZAC forces were not formed until the beginning of World War I - almost 130 years after the American War of Independence.
Yes- it was called the American Revolution. The US went to war with Great Britain.
In 1607 there was no American War of Independence (that war was 1776).
Simon Bolivar fought in the Venezuelan War of Independence. which was part of the bigger Latin American wars of independence. He was proclaimed El Libertador during the Admirable Campaign.
True, only 33 percent of the colonists actually supported the fight for Independence during the American Revolutionary War.
The ANZACs were on the winning side, so they did not lose the war. The attack on Gallipoli failed, but it was absolutely no fault of the ANZACs.