No, the early factory workers in New England and Europe did not profit much as most of them were overworked.
Profit.
labors workers
Because 'capital' is the money that can be used to produce more wealth, i.e. profit. The goal of the factory owners in the 19th century was the same as of today's factory owners. They want to become rich, of course. If they have capital, they can invest some part of it to make their business (shop, factory) larger and to make their factories more productive by buying newer and newer machines which produce more products in a shorter period of time. Of course the factory owners have to pay the costs of the production (energy, raw material, shipping expenses, wages for workers, taxes). The remaining amount of money is their profit.
New England.
To build cars and make a profit.
it makes the legitimate business owner to make no profit and when the profit decline, workers loss their jobs
Profit
England became a colonizing country mainly for profit.
No. The whole point of a non-profit organization is that it's non-profit. All of their earnings go to their cause and all of the workers in the organization are volunteers.
The basic and underlying premise to Karl Marx theories were the concept of economic exploitation of labor. For example, a worker constructs an object, and the factory owner gains profit over its sale. Profit Marx argues profit removes from a workers just compensation (pay).
By starting the Navigation Act :)
By starting the Navigation Act :)