Catholic Tradition, writings of the early Church Fathers and biblical passages place Peter in Rome in the early 5th decade of the first century AD. However, in AD49 the Roman Emperor Claudius grew fearful of the Jewish population in Rome and conflicts between Christianized Jews and the tradional Jews. He ordered the Jews out of Rome. Peter was one of them. He appears in Jerusalem about the year 49 or 50 for the Council of Jerusalem. Because of the political situation in Jerusalem Peter went to Antioch where he ruled the Church until Nero became Roman Emperor in AD56 and lifted the Jewish expulsion. Peter then returned to Rome where he remained until his death sometime between AD64 and 67. For more information see this link.
There is no evidence that Peter ever went to Rome. In fact, Clement of Rome, writing about Peter, approximately 95 CE and so just a few decades after the time of Peter (1 Clement),seems to have been entirely unaware that Peter ever visited Rome.
The tradition that Peter went to Rome seems to have begun with the second-century Pope Anicetus, who wished to demonstrate that he spoke with the authority of Peter, and so reported that Peter had been beheaded in Rome. A century later, Origen changed this to say that Peter was sentenced to crucifixion but, feeling unworthy of being crucified like Jesus, asked to be crucified upside down.
Peter was a commercial fisherman before becoming an apostle.
According to nearly 2000 years of tradition, Peter was crucified upside down in Rome under orders from Emperor Nero sometime between 64 and 67 AD.. Peter did not feel worthy to die in the same manner as Our Lord so requested that he be turned upside down. The crucifixion of Peter in Rome is held by all Christians with the exception of a minority of Protestant sects.
Peter was never confirmed to be crucified. Peter's and all other apostle's mode of death cannot be found in or outside the Bible.AnswerThe year is known. Dr John MacArthur in "The MacArthur Study Bible" says in the Introduction to 2nd Peter: Nero died in AD 68 and tradition says Peter died in Nero's persecution. [It was] written just before his death (see 2Peter 1:14) c.a. AD 67-68."It is mentioned in sources outside the Bible. Herbert Lockyer in "All The apostles Of The Bible" (1970) page 257 says:Macarius of Magnesia said that Peter of Rome was crucified in Rome....Peter did go to Rome and was martyred there during the Neronian persecution....There is also [the 2nd century document] "The Acts of Peter" extant in fragments, except for the account of his martyrdom...
Peter was chosen by Our Lord as both an apostle and also as the leader of His new Church - the first pope. He was crucified upside down on Rome under orders of the Roman Emperor Nero.
As with the current Saint Peter's Basilica, the old basilica was dedicated to Saint peter the Apostle.
It was Peter as he was crucified in Rome.
There is no scripture reference that places Peter in Rome. Any such evidences are outside the Bible.
Saint Peter on the orders of Nero,
According to tradition, St. Peter the Apostle was buried in Rome, specifically in a necropolis on Vatican Hill where St. Peter's Basilica now stands. His tomb was discovered in 1940 and confirmed by archaeological investigations in the following years.
The Apostle Peter was martyred in Rome, and his successors in Rome remained there to continue his leadership of the Church. Geography is unimportant, history happens to place him in Rome.
As you are not clear on which apostle. Peter went to Rome, Thomas to India, and Paul made 3 missionary journeys to Antioch, Ephesus, Corinth and Thessolinica.
Catholic tradition says that the apostle Peter went to Rome to lead the Christians there, and that he was the first pope. There is no actual evidence that Peter ever went to Rome, and Clement of Rome, writing (1 Clement) just thirty years after Peter was supposedly in Rome, appears to have been unaware that Peter had been to Rome. The tradition that Peter was in Rome is believed to have begun during the second century, probably by Anicetus of Rome.If the pope is the bishop of Rome there could not have been a pope until the role was established in the second century. In the view of some, Anicetus might have been the first to hold that position, an his assertion that Peter was his predecessor would have strengthened his authority.For more information, please visit:http://christianity.answers.com/catholicism/a-brief-history-of-the-early-popes
Peter was a very old man when he was crucified on the cross in Rome.
It was formed in Jerusalem by Jesus Christ and given to the Apostle Peter to be the Head of it. Paul the Apostle to the Gentiles spread the "good news" around the world and started the Church in Rome.
Peter was a commercial fisherman before becoming an apostle.
St. Peter the Apostle Church was created in 1842.
because he s 10 apostle