no.
No, Dollar diplomacy did not result in a weaker role for the US overseas. In fact, it aimed to increase US influence and economic power in foreign countries. The policy involved using American economic strength and investments to advance US interests abroad, particularly in Latin America and East Asia. It did face some challenges and criticisms, but overall, it helped enhance the US role in global affairs.
A weaker dollar, higher negative balances in trade, and increased unemployment in the U.S. due to use of overseas labor.
the dollar has always been the weaker, however, like any other hard currency it rallies on a daily basis
A weaker Canadian dollar is good for Canada's exports, because it makes our products less expensive to buy.
Our dollar is weaker than their moneythe dollar is weak
Weaker than the Euro.
There is always that hope, but we are currently spending wild amounts of money as a nation, that we can not ever repay. The result is a weaker dollar and less ability to spend as a nation. The hope of a stronger dollar is tied with the rationing of our Governmental spending. We are currently at record levels and trying for more.
The Manchu dynasty grew weaker.
Not if the dollar keeps getting weaker from the government bailouts.
Gunboat diplomacy refers to the use of military force or the threat of military action to influence the decisions or behavior of another country. It typically involves the deployment of naval forces to assert dominance or pressure a nation into complying with certain demands. This approach has been historically used by powerful countries to intimidate or coerce weaker nations.
Let me explain by the example of a single man, Gold get stronger with weaker dollar price because A person keep its reserves in a $ or Gold, When $ get weaker than he want to get Gold in exchange of $ so demand for gold increases and its price goes high. And when $ get stronger then he again wants to get $ in exchnge 4 gold so the process reverses.
The Manchu dynasty grew weaker.
lower price