Yes. In its per curiam opinion the Court held that the government did not overcome the "heavy presumption against" prior restraint of the press in this case. Justices Black and Douglas argued that the vague word "security" should not be used "to abrogate the fundamental law embodied in the First Amendment." Justice Brennan reasoned that since publication would not cause an inevitable, direct, and immediate event imperiling the safety of American forces, prior restraint was unjustified.
Taxing a newspaper publication violates the First Amendment, which protects freedom of the press. Any tax specifically targeting the content of a publication would be considered unconstitutional under the freedom of the press clause.
Prior restraints. It keeps the government from interfering with the publication of opinions. Individuals can express themselves through publication and distribution of information without interference, constraint, or persecution by the government.
but no
the first ten amendments
The first amendment prevents the prior restraint of information. The first amendment gives people the freedom of speech and religion.
yes it is true. the first amendment allows "freedom of press"
== ==
it would be a violation of the 1st amendment
Information is grouped together by the subject of each amendment. (apex)
The right to vote is gua to all male citizens regardless of race color or previous condition
WA covers many countries and jurisdictions. However, I think I can answer for the US and possibly most of Europe in this case. First, anyone may ask any question they wish, as long as the question itself imparts no classified information. And if you don't have access to classified information, either directly or via third parties,you should be fine. In the US, this is protected strongly by the 1st Amendment. General jurisprudence does not allow for penalties for security breaches, when you cannot possibly know the information you're discussing is classified. This is the reason that classified documents, for instance, are all marked with a level of classification. The law restricts the transfer of classifed information; not the question.
The First Amendment protects the press by ensuring that as long as their stories are fact, opinion based, and do not cause malice towards another party, that they cannot be arrested, fined, thrown out of publication, or made to pay extra taxes.