No, they got as far as taking Athens before they were turned back.
The Greek word used for "conquer" is NIKAO.
Athens (smart, sporty, perfect) Megara (all about money) Sparta (TOTAL SPORT FREAKS lol) Corinth (crafts) Argos (acting and drama)
yes :)it did
They are not at all unexpeced. They were carefully planned by the Greek commanders. I suggest you took at some of the more popular questions in Ancient Wars, where the Greek strategies are explained. Start looking up the answer to the question:How did the Persians lose the Persian wars
The Persians decided to bring all the Greek cities under control to enforce peace. They invaded in strength ten years later.
180,000 Persians won. This took place in the battle of Thermopylae. Leonidas and his army of 6,000 to 7,000 Spartans but were delayed by the Persians when a Greek traitor showed the Persians how to attack from both sides. Leonidas commanded all of his soldiers to escape except for 300 Spartans.
From 336 to 325 BCE.
The Persians decided that the Athenian victory would encourage all the Greeks to rise against them, and determined to bring all the Greek cities under control, by agreement or conquest. Some agreed , some resisted and the Persians invaded mainland Greece, culminating in the battles of Salamis, Plataea and Mycale. The Greco-Persians lasted from 499 to 449 BCE.
1. The Greek alliances established and retained naval dominance, which removed the threat of Persia attacking individual city-states and defeating the alliance in detail one by one. 2. The Persians had problems in controlling the diverse peoples in their empire, and could not concentrate all their effort on the hundreds of Greek city-states. 3. The Persian object had been to gain control of the Greek city-states to stop their ongoing fighting amongst each other spilling over into the Persian Empire. When the Persians withdrew, the Greek city-states went back to fighting each other.
Very succesful, as it turned out. He did not even have to physically conquer them all. After a number of succesful sieges and battles, the Greek city-States subjected themselves to him. Philip created the Hellenic League of which all Greek States became a member, with Philip himself as the undisputed leader of the League.
Persians believed in an all-powerful king, but many Greeks believed that citizens should choose their own rulers.
The Persians wanted a peaceful world, and their aim was to put an end to the incessant fighting between the Greek cities which spilled over into the Persian empire's Greek cities. So perhaps Greece would have been spared the endliss ongoing wars which ravaged it if a Persian peace had been imposed. Of course the Greek cities which banded together to repel the Persians wouldn't see it that way. From a purely military perspective, the Persian army was also much larger and much more formidable than any Greek force that could be assembled to meet them. Surrendering in advance of the conflict would have prevented all of the possibly pointless loss of life from opposing the Persians.