The Persians wanted a peaceful world, and their aim was to put an end to the incessant fighting between the Greek cities which spilled over into the Persian empire's Greek cities. So perhaps Greece would have been spared the endliss ongoing wars which ravaged it if a Persian peace had been imposed.
Of course the Greek cities which banded together to repel the Persians wouldn't see it that way.
From a purely military perspective, the Persian army was also much larger and much more formidable than any Greek force that could be assembled to meet them. Surrendering in advance of the conflict would have prevented all of the possibly pointless loss of life from opposing the Persians.
Because most of the records historians have about the Persians were written by Greeks, the history is very skewed (Greeks hated the Persians- they had lots of wars). It's very negatively biased.
Basically the greeks themselves, Persians, romans, goths, and that's about it.
The Persians threatened the Greeks
The Mediterranean Sea.
Greeks could have attacked before the Persians but a lot of the evidence points to the Persians attacking first, the Persians were most likely to have fought when they got off their boats and when they encountered in the valley, but, the Greeks were to have probably ran away into the valley than to have been chased.
The Greeks had superior armor and tactics than did the Persians .
The Greeks stood their ground and fought for their freedom against the Persians. Their victory caused the Greeks many lives.
The Greeks stood their ground and fought for their freedom against the Persians. Their victory caused the Greeks many lives.
The Greeks.
The Greeks saw the Persians off, so nothing changed.
the Greeks were powerful
The Greeks fought against the Persians in the movie 300 starring Gerard Butler
They greatly outnumbered the Greeks..
They did not, the Persians won; the Greeks were WAAY outnumbered.
The Persians were not portrayed in the same heroic light that the Greeks were .
The Persians
Which battle.