I think some oversights were made in relation to the horrible medical experiments done on Chinese captives prior to and during WW 2 in exchange for the hand over of information gained to American interests.
No,it is crime against humanity
What specific aspect of Japan`s actions during World War II were you considering as a crime against humanity? Human rights instruments are largely politically-motivated, and there was clearly no appetite among the Allied forces (Russia excluded) to alienate Japan from the world community. All this aside, in the aftermath of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, an argument made to insist that Japanshould observe human rights would appear largely ironic to any American prosecutors.
this is a war of Germany and the u.s. in ww1 and not japan, it has to deal with the zimmerman telegraph.
because they invaded Africa and they were joining forces with Germany and Japan fighting against humanity
Russia, although most of its population is in Europe, which has 2,925,000 crimes Japan is in 2nd with 2,854,000 crimes. Then India with 1,765,000 crimes.
Nuremberg , Germany and , in Japan ,Tokyo (War Crimes Tribunal) .
The Humanity Declaration was when the emperor of Japan renounced his title of divinity. This was due to Japan losing the war.
Capital punishment is legal in Japan. The only crimes for which capital punishment is statutory are homicide and treason.
stick them in our butts to keep them warm for the winter
Because of Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombing. Also, Japan had committed war crimes. Also, Japan has promised to the entire world to not to commit crimes again. And, it says if Japan has a strange movement, or if it attacks, then, foreign country can attack them without any declaration.
war doesn't sot out everything
japan town