Compared to the other countries involved in the war? Less, most likely because the US only had significant military presence beginning in the summer of 1918. Compared to World War II? Again less, this time because of the difference in technology and length of American troop commitment. Compared to the US Civil War? Almost 500,000 less because the Civil War was desperately fought by only Americans. There were more American casualities in World War I than each of the following: American Revolution, War 1812 and the Spanish-American War.
First Place: Soviet Union 28 million to 20 millionSecond: China 15 million Third Place: Poland 6 millionFourth Place: Germany 5.8 millionFifth/Sixth Place: Yugoslavia and Japan 1.5 million both.The other contries suffered less casualties than 500,000 killed
New and improved guns and artillery caused more casualties. Poison gas terrified soldiers. ... The Eastern front shifted over more area than the Western front, with less trench warfare and even more casualties.
The total is unclear, but most were in China, Korea, and the Philippines. Estimates range as high as 30 million, but may be less, with the estimates in China alone varying from 5 to 20 million. There were no objective counts made during the Japanese occupation of China and Southeast Asia.(see related link)
To save resources for the war effort.
During World War II, the cost of living was much lower than it is today. For instance, gasoline could be purchased for less than 20 cents per gallon, bread was less than 10 cents per loaf, and postage stamps were less than 5 cents apiece.
First Place: Soviet Union 28 million to 20 millionSecond: China 15 million Third Place: Poland 6 millionFourth Place: Germany 5.8 millionFifth/Sixth Place: Yugoslavia and Japan 1.5 million both.The other contries suffered less casualties than 500,000 killed
To stop the war and get all the states back together in the shortest amount of time so there would be less casualties. Hope I helped :)
allied forces : less than 2000
To visit the main cities of the world with less budget, visit the cities during the low season.
New and improved guns and artillery caused more casualties. Poison gas terrified soldiers. ... The Eastern front shifted over more area than the Western front, with less trench warfare and even more casualties.
Less than a thousand.
New and improved guns and artillery caused more casualties. Poison gas terrified soldiers. ... The Eastern front shifted over more area than the Western front, with less trench warfare and even more casualties.
247,780 road casualties which is 4% less than what it was in the year 2006.
No, the United States won in both Europe and the Pacific in 1945. We also won the casualty race and had less casualties than nearly every country that participated in WWII
The total is unclear, but most were in China, Korea, and the Philippines. Estimates range as high as 30 million, but may be less, with the estimates in China alone varying from 5 to 20 million. There were no objective counts made during the Japanese occupation of China and Southeast Asia.(see related link)
Less chance of escape and lesser civilian casualties, atleast thats what i think.
World war 2 had the most casualties and Truman was a world war one veteran so he chose to use those weapon to end the war sooner with less service member to be getting killled.