They were called peace negotiations; and the US simply wanted the North Vietnamese to pull their troops out of South Vietnam and quit trying to take it over.
They were called peace talks (peace negotiations). The US simply wanted Hanoi to pull their troops out of SOUTH Vietnam and quit trying to conquer the place.
No. Vietnam is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which holds them to the obligation of not having any nuclear weapons. Vietnam, as a respectable global citizen, is honoring its obligations to that treaty, so there is not even an issue.
The British warship that was sunk during the Vietnam War was HMS Coventry. It was a Royal Navy destroyer that was attacked and sunk by Argentine aircraft during the Falklands War in 1982, not the Vietnam War. However, the British did not lose any warships during the Vietnam War, as they were not directly involved in that conflict.
They funded the war.
Certainly. A war is determined explicitly by the presence of conflict. If there was not conflict in Vietnam, there would not have been a war.
The American Indians were not represented in any way during the Treaty of Paris negotiations.
There were not any troops in Vietnam during the Kennedy administration. Just 500 military advisors. Kennedy was assassinated before we sent troops
No, it wasn't because nobody won any land.
No, of course. Vietnamese's cause is just.
The goal of the Vietnam War was to stop the spread of communism. As such, the US felt the need to stop the influence of communist North Vietnam, which entailed supporting South Vietnam in any way possible.
The nation (country) of Vietnam didn't exist during the Vietnam War. Nor was any nation called "Vietnam" fighting the US. There was a country called North Vietnam that defeated the Republic of South Vietnam in 1975. The US was allied to the RVN (Republic of South Vietnam).
Diem was reportedly extremely anti-communist, and any national (citizen) showing communist trends was stomped out quickly.