No. Your definitions are completely mixed up:
Hispanic is the term for people (regardless of ethnicity) who speaks Spanish. This includes Spaniards, Mexicans, Argentines or Chileans, but not people who speak other languages (e.g. Brazilians, who speak Portuguese).
Latino is the term for people from Latin America, which includes all people south of the United States within the Americas, such as Mexicans, Brazilians and Cubans, but it does not include Spaniards (who are from Europe).
People from most of the Caribbean and certain parts of northern and eastern South America have African ancestry. For example, almost half the population of Brazil could be considered African or mulatto (mix of European and African ancestry). On the other hand, countries such as Mexico mostly have a population with a mix of European and Native-American ancestry, known as mestizo. Other countries such as Venezuela, Chile or Argentina, are mainly populated by people with European ancestry.
yucatan
Muslim in Africa were big in slavery. Muslims in Africa would trade females to slavery.
Slavery in Africa is still extant.
The life was miserable in the slavery era in South Africa.
There was no slavery in Africa before the Europeans got involved!
Slavery in West Africa started as early as the 7th century. Slavery in West Africa reached it's peak when slave traders would trade slaves for use in the Americas.
it didnt evolve the african americans were taken from there home in africa to america. thay had no choice
yES he is rasist towards hispanic Africa-Americans and Asians
The Ottoman Empire stopped slavery in Africa. Slavery was abolished from Africa in the year of 1847. In the US, slavery was abolished in 1865.
in africa
no it didnt
The person that thought slavery was an improvement over life in Africa was Governor George McDuffie. He also believed that slavery was the will of God.