No, a smaller Atomic Mass does not mean that the atom will have a higher atomic number. In fact, the opposite is true. An atom will have an atomic mass equal to approximately its atomic number multiplied by two. This is because the prime mass contributions of the atom comes from only the protons and neutrons. These tend to exist in an atom in a ratio of approximately 1:1 and have very similar masses (1.6726x10-27kg versus 1.6749x10-27kg for protons and neutrons, respectively).
Note that the 1:1 ratio between protons and neutrons is a very large approximation that works well for the first 20 elements of the Periodic Table, and gets progressively less accurate beyond that point. The greatest exception to this rule is hydrogen, which does not have a neutron to accompany its sole proton.
The atomic mass of iodine is about 126.9 g/mol, which is indeed less than the atomic mass of many other elements. This low atomic mass for iodine is due to its position in the periodic table and the number of protons and neutrons in its nucleus.
Atomic number is the number of protons. Atomic mass is (mostly) the sum of the masses of the protons and neutrons (more or less).
AlphaThe atomic number goes down by two and the atomic mass number goes down by four.Beta-The atomic number goes up by one and the atomic mass number stays the same.Beta+The atomic number goes down by one and the atomic mass number stays the same.
Because the periodic table is organized by atomic number, not by atomic mass. The general trend in the periodic table is a higher atomic mass as you go up atomic number, but there are exceptions.
Each element on the periodic table has two numbers: the atomic number and the relative atomic mass. The atomic number is the number of protons in the nucleus, and the relative atomic mass is the total number of protons and neutrons (so the difference between them is the number of neutrons). The relative atomic mass is always the higher of the two.
The atomic mass number must be higher as that represent the number of protons and neutrons in an element. Whereas only the number of protons are represented in the Atomic Number.
Iron has a higher density than potassium because of its atomic structure and mass. Iron (Fe) has a higher atomic number (26) and a greater atomic mass compared to potassium (K), which has an atomic number of 19. The closely packed arrangement of iron atoms in its metallic lattice contributes to its higher density, while potassium's larger atomic size and less compact structure result in a lower density. Consequently, the combination of atomic mass and packing contributes to the density difference between the two elements.
No element can have those features; the mass can never be less than the atomic number in any element.
The atomic number represents the number of protons in an atom, while the atomic mass represents the sum of protons and neutrons. Generally, the atomic mass is larger than the atomic number for most elements since it includes both protons and neutrons.
Atomic mass includes the total mass of protons, neutrons, and electrons in an atom. Since protons and neutrons contribute significantly to the mass of an atom, atomic mass is generally greater than atomic number, which represents the number of protons in the nucleus. Electrons have a much smaller mass compared to protons and neutrons, so they have less impact on the overall atomic mass.
I think your understanding is confused. Atomic No. of '6' indicates the position in the periodic table, the number of protons, and the number of electrons. Atomic Mass is a number ( equal to or greater than atomic no.), which is the the total of protons and neutrons in the nucleus of an atom . So you atomic mass of '5' is incorrect as it is less than '6'. I think you mean 5 neutrons. If so the atomic mass is 6 + 5 = 11 This would be the isotopic element C-11 (Carbon eleven).
Both argon and cobalt have this characteristic.