0
Yes.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are rite aid house brands tested on animals?
According to multiple different sources, Rite Aid does not test their products on animals. This includes testing during the manufacturing process and testing following the production of the product.
Are animals harmed while being tested on with makeup products?
Yes, some animals are harmed during testing for makeup. But it only depends on the product being used.
What kind of products receive penetration testing?
Products receive penetration testing during manufacturing include computer systems and networks. The penetration testing is to see how well the system would work during a virus or other harmful circumstance.
How many animals are killed during testing?
In the U.k. 1,373,400 a year
Why should products be tested on animals?
we should test products on animals because they can easily be replaced and humans cant -- Rubbish! Humans are different from animals. What is good or bad for one is not necessarily for the other. We should test on convicted prisoners! These people have committed crimes against society and this way they can serve their debt to society.
Does medical testing do more harm than good?
yes, in many cases of animal testing animals die and or get very sick during the testing process.
What household products could require viscosity testing during manufacturing?
honey and corn syrup.
How many unnecessary deaths of animals is there during animal testing?
all deaths in animal testing are unnecessary. animals and humans regularly have different reactions to drugs and other things they test, so it is almost never accurate.
What animals are killed during animal testing?
yes well that's not the only reason there's hunting cars poachers animal fights cruel people real sudden environment changes but animal testing is a big part of it like dissection and testing new medicine and other experi Cancel ments
Is it ok to test on animals?
No, absolutely not! Testing on animals, whether it's cosmetics, drugs, cleaners, etc., is a horribly cruel way to treat animals. Most people are not aware of just what the animals do go through during the testing processes, but I can tell you it is horrific. They are subjected to incredible pain while being used for testing, then when those using them for testing are through with them, they are then killed or sold to unethical dog food companies who actually use them in their dog food. If these products need to be tested on living things, then they should give those on death row the option to have their sentence commuted from death row to life without parole in exchange for allowing themselves to be used in the testing. And to those who would argue that this would be unethical, no it wouldn't. At least the death row inmates would have the choice, whereas the innocent animals have no say in the matter. For more information, you can go to PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). They will even mail (email or snail mail) brochures for you to read and photos of exactly what these poor animals have to endure. I warn you though, the photos are graphic and hard to get out of your mind once you've seen them, unless you're one of those cold, heartless types who don't care about innocent animals and the horrible pain they endure while being used for testing the products.
What are the bad things for animal testing?
There are many harmful effects of animal testing. Namely, animals experience prolonged suffering and death. Also, companies continue to participate in animal testing as long as people fail to speak out against it.
Advantage and Disadvantages of Animal Testing?
Reasons For Animal TestingMedical Advancement: The most obvious advantage of animal testing is for medical experimentation. Advancements in medicine help people, animals, and even plants. Unfortunately, the best way to test potentially new medicines is through animal testing, and if initially successful, then by human testing too. It is considered more humane to do medical testing on animals first, then on humans first, for the obvious reason that human life is considered more precious than animals. Additionally, new medicines can also help animals too, so this falls under the philosophy of the needs of the many (animals) outweigh the needs of the few (animals). Meaning the few animals that are sacrificed or tested upon is worth less than the many animals that are potentially saved or helped, thus helping the greater good is more morale. Of course, this opinion is subjective to each person.Product Safety: Another popular reason for animal testing is for determining the safety of products, such as cosmetics testing. In theory, animals used for safety testing are typically not killed and remain healthy, however they are often maltreated. Again, it is commonly considered that the safety of people outweighs the safety of animals, thus animal testing for safety is common.Scientific Knowledge: Animal testing and experimentation is an excellent source to increase scientific knowledge. No one knows what knowledge that will be attained through animal testing, so the value of such animal testing cannot be ascertained ahead of time or even guessed. The most common examples of animal experimentation for scientific knowledge are animal biopsies and vivisections in schools to teach children biology and medical procedures. While this type of animal testing might not yield immediate useful results, it has been helpful in the long term of helping science.Accuracy: Finally, the biggest reason for animal testing is because it works better than any other alternative. Why animal testing can yield results different than human testing, the similarities between animals and humans is staggering and thus helpful to mankind.Reasons Against Animal TestingTorture and Suffering: Animals undergoing testing can be subjected to torture and suffering. Alternatively in some cases, some animals may be even cured of their ailments and diseases during the process of animal testing.Death: Animals can, and sometimes often, die in the process of animal testing.Ethics/Morality: The ethics and morality of testing on animals is often debated. A large number of people do not believe animal testing is ethical, however they often concede that it is necessary.Choice: Since animals cannot volunteer for animal testing, then some people believe animal testing is not ethical. These people believe that it is only ethical to test on subjects who willingly give their consent for self testing.Accuracy: As mentioned before, animals are different than people, thus their testing results are not always useful or practical for human comparisons. Therefore, if the usefulness of animal testing is in question, then animal testing should be reconsidered.Price: Finally, the price of keeping and disposing of animals can be quite high. That is why testing, on computer simulations, has increased recently. However, the accuracy of computer simulations is less than animal testing.
