answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There are very few actual scientists that worked on the 2007 report. Out of a pool of over 300 individuals, most were economists and only 52 were actual scientists of any discipline.

Of the 52 actual scientists, 30 of them registered some form of complaint with the methods and conclusions drawn, although they did agree that the primary cause of the current warming trend was man.

What is more telling recently though is the IPCC itself is backing down and appears to be looking for ways of mitigating their liability for poor predictions.

They recently stated:

"Uncertainty in the sign of projected changes in climate extremes over the coming two to three decades is relatively large because climate change signals are expected to be relatively small compared to natural climate variability".

Many other groups have joined the troops questioning the accuracy of their report. Over 1000 scientists have viewed the report and the information and find flaws and dispute the finds.

A March 14, 2009 article in the Australian revealed that Japanese scientists are now at the forefront of rejecting man-made climate fears prompted by the UN IPCC.

Scientists that argue against the conclusions of the IPCC include (but are not limited to):

Freeman Dyson, Professor Emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society

Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences

Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics department at Stockholm University and former Chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999-2003)

Garth Paltridge, Visiting Fellow ANU and retired Chief Research Scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired Director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre

Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London

Hendrik Tennekes, retired Director of Research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute

Khabibullo Abdusamatov, mathematician and astronomer at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Sallie Baliunas, astronomer, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa

Chris de Freitas, Associate Professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland

David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester

Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University

William M. Gray, Professor Emeritus and head of The Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University

William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy, Princeton University

David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware

Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa

Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and Professor of Geology at Carleton University in Canada

Ian Plimer, Professor emeritus of Mining Geology, The University of Adelaide

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Do any IPCC scientists dispute the IPCC's findings?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

What scandals has the IPCC been part of?

The IPCC has also been involved in a number of scandals including: Climate-Gate - e-mails obtained from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia suggested that facts inconvenient to the global warming case were being deliberately hidden/obscured. Himalaya-Gate - Alarmist report by the IPCC that the Himalyan glacier will have melted by 2035. As it transpired the report was without any scientific basis. Amazon-Gate - The IPCC claimed that up to 40% of the rain forests in the Amazon were at risk from global warming and would likely be replaced by "tropical savannas" if temperatures continued to rise. The scientific-looking report, on which this claim was based, was a non-peer reviewed article for the WWF, by an Australian policy analyst and a freelance journalist for the Guardian newspaper (not even experts let alone scientists!). But the biggest scandal to date is the IPCC's claim, made in 1995, that it had found "a "discernible human influence" on the earth's changing climate. The claim was inserted by the report's lead author, Ben Santer of the Lawrence Livermore government laboratory, after the IPCC's consulting scientists had agreed a draft that specifically said no such "human fingerprint" had been found. Due to this deliberate reversal of the report's findings, Santer also altered the trajectory of every IPCC document since. He argued that the alteration that it was justified based on two of his own studies, which "cherry-picked" the earth's temperature record from 1963-1987, deliberately ignoring temperatures that didn't confirm the Greenhouse theory. Thus the "discernible human influence" as claimed by the IPCC remains without scientific support to this day.


Who is the head of IPCC?

Rajendra PachauriRajendra Pachauri


What is the fullform of IPcC?

Intergovernmental panel on climate change


How much funding does the IPCC receive from the federal government?

According to Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO), the US currently funds the IPCC to the tune of $12.5 million a year (increasing to $13 million in 2012), although this figure is disputed by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-California) claiming that the IPCC receives $2.3 million in federal funding. However this may be a moot point as, following debate the House of Representatives, on Saturday 19 February 2011, voted 244 to 179 to eliminate funding for the United Nations IPCC.


How close have been the predictions of the InterGovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC?

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is an organization set up by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in 1988. Its aims are to assess the impacts of human induced climate change, its impacts and possible adaptation and mitigation.The IPCC, which is made up of many climate related scientists who perform their work on a voluntary base, does not conduct any research itself. It makes periodical assessments based on all the available mostly peer-reviewed scientific studies, papers and research published to date by climate related scientists (climatologists, biologists, paleo-climatologists, oceanographers, physicists, etc.) world-wide.Their latest assessment from 2007 (the so called Fourth Assessment) was written by 620 authors and editors from 40 countries. Its next assessment is due in 2014.To date, the IPCC's predictions have been pretty accurate, perhaps even too conservative some argue. For example, IPCC estimates from their first assessment report that the global temperature would increase by 0.15 °C and 0.3 °C per decade has proven to be true as over the last 10 years the global temperature increased 0.2 °C.In its latest assessment the IPCC also predicted an increase in heat-waves, heavy rainfall, and increased flood risks, all of which have increased over the past few years.

Related questions

What scandals has the IPCC been part of?

The IPCC has also been involved in a number of scandals including: Climate-Gate - e-mails obtained from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia suggested that facts inconvenient to the global warming case were being deliberately hidden/obscured. Himalaya-Gate - Alarmist report by the IPCC that the Himalyan glacier will have melted by 2035. As it transpired the report was without any scientific basis. Amazon-Gate - The IPCC claimed that up to 40% of the rain forests in the Amazon were at risk from global warming and would likely be replaced by "tropical savannas" if temperatures continued to rise. The scientific-looking report, on which this claim was based, was a non-peer reviewed article for the WWF, by an Australian policy analyst and a freelance journalist for the Guardian newspaper (not even experts let alone scientists!). But the biggest scandal to date is the IPCC's claim, made in 1995, that it had found "a "discernible human influence" on the earth's changing climate. The claim was inserted by the report's lead author, Ben Santer of the Lawrence Livermore government laboratory, after the IPCC's consulting scientists had agreed a draft that specifically said no such "human fingerprint" had been found. Due to this deliberate reversal of the report's findings, Santer also altered the trajectory of every IPCC document since. He argued that the alteration that it was justified based on two of his own studies, which "cherry-picked" the earth's temperature record from 1963-1987, deliberately ignoring temperatures that didn't confirm the Greenhouse theory. Thus the "discernible human influence" as claimed by the IPCC remains without scientific support to this day.


In what year did Infinity Property and Casualty Corporation - IPCC - have its IPO?

Infinity Property and Casualty Corporation (IPCC) had its IPO in 2003.


Who is the head of IPCC?

Rajendra PachauriRajendra Pachauri


What is the market cap for Infinity Property and Casualty Corporation IPCC?

As of July 2014, the market cap for Infinity Property and Casualty Corporation (IPCC) is $749,879,759.38.


What is considered as the leading scientific authority on climate change?

The InterGovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is made up of scientists around the world. They gather data and experiments from everywhere and analyse them to find out the facts about climate change.


What is the fullform of IPcC?

Intergovernmental panel on climate change


What is the full form of IPCC?

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.


What has the UN done in trying to solve problems created by climate change?

The UN's InterGovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) examines data and reports from climate change scientists around the world. It holds regular sessions (April 2016 was its 43rd meeting) and prepares assessments and reports.It is now in its Sixth Assessment Cycle. The Fifth Assessment Cycle produced the following reports:Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science BasisClimate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and VulnerabilityClimate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate ChangeClimate Change 2014: Synthesis report.Click here for the IPCC website:http://www.ipcc.ch/index.htmHere is a video prepared by the IPCC.


When result of ca-ipcc will come?

expected date will be aug 4th


Ca- ipcc may 2010 result date?

29th July


What is full form ipcc in ca?

intergovernmental panel on climate change


How much funding does the IPCC receive from the federal government?

According to Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO), the US currently funds the IPCC to the tune of $12.5 million a year (increasing to $13 million in 2012), although this figure is disputed by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-California) claiming that the IPCC receives $2.3 million in federal funding. However this may be a moot point as, following debate the House of Representatives, on Saturday 19 February 2011, voted 244 to 179 to eliminate funding for the United Nations IPCC.