nope, if what i understand is right, then no they don't.
Do clones exist? No. So "Do clones have the same fingure prints?" No.
No.The clone either has no thumbprint at all or has a different thumbprint.
No human has yet been cloned. With the exception of identical twins.
As of today, scientists have not cloned any people. They have only cloned animals and are still trying to find the symptoms of cloning. If it is harmless, scientists may start cloning people. If it is harmful, you will not might hear about clones in this world....
Cloning VectorsVectorMaximum Insert sizeApprox. No. of clones required in libraryAdvantages?Disadvantages?lambda20 kb5 x 105easy to construct libraries,relatively stable insertsmany clones requiredhard to prepare DNA from clonescosmid45 kb2 x 105easy to construct librarieseasy to prepare DNA from clonesnot always stableYAC1 Mb104few clones requiredvery prone to rearrangement,difficult to constructBAC> 500 kb5 x 104few clones requiredvery stablesingle copy origin of replication therefore harder to prepare DNA
Cloning is considered a taboo in the sense that no human should have the power to do what "god" does. Cloning happens naturally in nature when identical twins are born, but that is the only situation where it is present.
Their X-chromosomes - the chromosome that everything starts with by clones, are not as stabilized as them of the real objects that were cloned. Until now there is no way found to stabilize them, some say that a secret organization named AIOS got the way to change that but the government isn't 100% sure that it will really help. That's all I can say I .
Not really. While koalas are the only known animal to have distinctive fingerprints, they can be distinguished from the fingerprints of a human. Like humans, their fingerprints comprise ridges in a variety of patterns.
No humans have been cloned yet. Should a human ever be cloned, then presumably, the clone would be identical (genetically) to the original from which it is copied; thus, it would be a human.
In the human population, clones are referred to as identical twins. Identical twins occur naturally when a fertilized egg splits into two separate embryos, resulting in two individuals with the same genetic makeup. Cloning, on the other hand, refers to the artificial creation of an identical copy of an organism.
A clone.
Because the process of cloning requires taking an individuals DNA and putting it into a cell (in the case of a human an egg) and getting the egg to grow and reproduce that human that the DNA came from. Identical twins are genetic duplicates, but in the strict interpretation of the word "cloning" they are NOT clones because they were developed from one fertilized egg.
Human beings and koala bears can have fingerprints. The fingerprints of koala bears are often confused with that of human beings!
No they are not.
The koala is the only animal with distinctive and unique fingerprints. The fingerprints are very similar to that of humans in that they are comprised of patterns, but the trained eye can distinguish them quite easily from human fingerprints.
You have asked if there are any human clones. Technically there are no human clones because it is illegal to do so. Human cloning is illegal because people might use them for their own good and treat them in a bad way. Another reason is that if human cloning happens, then there might be a return to serfdom. These are the main reasons why there cant be cloning and if there is no cloning or not. [Illegal in the US and most countries. Technically the cloning of a human is far more difficult than cloning of sheep, cattle and mice. But not impossible. It is only a matter of time before it happens.
no. every human has different fingerprints, twins or not
All mammals have unique fingerprints.
kaas