A husband and wife do absorb each other's debt. They each become responsible for the debts incurred by the other spouse.
Yes, Wisconsin is a "marital property" state. This means that both the husband and wife "own" assets AND debt jointly.
It really depends on the situation.
of course; it would be offensive if not
It depends on your state. You should definitely get a lawyer!
If the property is owned by the husband and wife as tenants by the entirety a lien for the debt of one will not affect the property.
No.No.No.No.
If the wife was listed as a cardholder (even secondary) probably.
Normally the spouse is held liable for the debt. The presumption is that they benefited by the goods and services.
If the debt is on a shared account, then yes, the wife's pay can be garnished even if the husband was the one who ran the debt up.
Her estate is responsible for the debt. In most cases he will have to pay from the estate or his own pockets.
If the husband is not a contractual party to the debt, then no, he is not responsible regardless of what state the debts originate from. If the debts were incurred pre- or post-nuptual, it still does not matter provided the husband is not a contractual party to the debt. If however the husband has any joint assetts with the wife, if the Washington creditor seeks to recover the debt by attaching assetts and discovers them in the state in which she currently resides with the husband, those assetts will be attached and disbursed to the creditors, regardless of whether or not the husband is a contractual party to the debt.
In many cases the husband will be held responsible. They are deemed to have benefited from to goods and services.