All that is true, but it is also true that characterizing any of these in a proper theoretical framework will inherently involve quantum mechanics, special relativity and general relativity.
Addendum:If the question is posed as to whether photons have "physical mass," one must ask for a definition of nonphysical mass. There is mass, just mass, and there is no circumventing "mass." It does not come in types or flavors or with provisos. Mass is mass.One more thing for the questioner:
Photons are quanta of energy, photons are not matter. They have mass since energy has mass. Mass as a property of energy is no different than mass as a property of matter. [Great summary of photon properties above]
Mass of photons? Zero, photons have no mass. If you mean energy, that is a different question, ask it.
light has zero mass. Photons have zero mass. So according to e=mc2 light must also have zero energy. Astonishing how all these photons reach us from all the way across the universe! But all physical things have mass
Yes... and that mass would be Zero. Photons don't have mass.
Photons have no mass.
Most likely not. Light is made up of photons, and even photons have mass..Thus light is a particle as particles are mass. But to confuse you, even though light = photons & photons = particle & particle = mass; the photons also act as a wave. Which is rather incredible, because it means that a mass also acts as a wave.
Photons and neutrinos dont have mass.
Light 'particles' (photons) have no rest mass.
mass
Photons have energy, therefore they have both mass, and momentum. (Note: They do have a "rest mass" or "invariant mass" of zero, which basically means that they can only move at the speed of light.) Photons of high energy (and high mass, and high momentum) can destroy molecules, or even atoms.
Photons are considered as particles without mass.
Now, all the particles are considered as having a mass (including photons).
The photons and neutrinos are considered without mass although they have a very small mass.