0
I'll speak as if you you mean Christianity and the God of The Bible.
Yes and no. Most scientific knowledge does not contradict God. (most Christians won't raise much of a stink if you tell them the Earth revolves around the Sun).
Many scientific theories do contradict God. Which is why they are theories-- they are as of yet unproven, and cannot be proven in truth if they do contradict God's reality.
Since no string of logic can disprove God without defeating itself, nothing disproves God in truth.
What else can I help you with?
What were the conflict between science and religion in 19th century?
The conflict between science and religion in 19th century was about the creation accounts.
How was science and religion like in the early 1400s like?
Religion and science had no conflict. Science was a way of discovering all the beautiful complexity of the world God made. nuff sed.
Why did the Islam's want to follow this religion?
Islam is the truth and doesn't conflict on science
What are some popular books one can purchase which delve into the relationship between Science and Religion?
There are many books that delve into the relationship between science and religion; however, many of these books have a bias towards science or a bias towards religion. Some books that delve into the relationship between science and religion are "Science and Christianity: Conflict or Coherence?" by Henry F. Schaefer III and "Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life" by Stephen Jay Gould.
Briefly discuss the conflict between SCIENCE and RELIGION in 19th century?
The main conflict between science and religion is that science requires solid evidence of the Biblical events while religion is based upon faith in knowing that because the Bible is the word of God it is true and the events took place because the Bible says they did. Science does not simply accept the fact that because God said it in the Bible it is true. They would have to see it to believe it and not act upon faith.
Is religion more powerful science?
Religion is not a science.
What has the author R C Wallace written?
R. C. Wallace has written: 'Science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science 'Religion, science and the modern world' -- subject(s): Religion and science
What are some arguments that science and religion do not conflict?
The main argument claiming that there is no conflict between science and religion is basically that God is a scientist, or at least works with science... that he understands and uses the forces of the universe to do what he does. As it has been throughout Earth's history, what looks like magic to one group is actually the technology of the other. If God knows everything, which is part of the definition of God, then what he does looks impossible and miraculous to us, but it is explainable once we get to a sufficient level to understand it.
How does science and religion conflict?
Science relates to Natural Law. Religion depends on Supernatural Law (outside of Natural Laws). " Four centuries before the birth of Christ, Greece was fast outgrowing her ancient faith. Her philosophers, in their studies of the world, had been profoundly impressed with the contrast between the majesty of the operations of Nature and the worthlessness of the divinities of Olympus. Her historians, considering the orderly course of political affairs, the manifest" see link History of the Conflict between Religion and Science / By John William Draper"below
What was the conflict between science and religion in the 1920s?
In the 1920s, a major conflict emerged between science and religion in the United States over the teaching of evolution in schools. This debate culminated in the famous Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925, where a high school teacher was tried for illegally teaching evolution in Tennessee. The trial highlighted the tensions between religious beliefs and scientific theories on the origins of life.
Is there a big word for the conflict between science and nature?
A:There is no conflict between science and nature. Science is what we learn about nature.
When did Albert Einstein say 'science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
Albert Einstein said, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" in his 1954 essay "Science and Religion." In the essay, he emphasized the importance of understanding and integrating both science and religion for a more holistic view of the world.
