no they dont they only noe parts of it
Prediciting exactly when a volcano will erupt is something that no scientist has been able to do, that is why there is a tier based warning system of volcanic unrest. The warning system itself tries to predict time frames based off the available seismic, gas, and deformation data that is available. The processes that specifically causes a volcano to erupt at one instance versus another though is not well understood and therefore prediction is always a highly educated guess based off the information that is available to the scientists.
There are always volcanoes forming.
There is always a difference between technology in leadership and followers. Leaders always lead while followers always follow in the use of technology.
When It always does eruptions.
I think that it limits what a scientist can study b/c it does cannot talk or explain its past which makes it unfair for the scientist although we do know about some of its past we would love to learn more.It can farther limit by not showing a reaction or a difference.We have to always look precisely and thoroghly. Save
No, economic models don't always predict economic behavior because models are based on assumptions, or things that we take for granted as true.
think. and at sometime they work.
science and technology is not always perfect
The noun 'Mayon Volcano' is a proper noun, the name of a specific volcano. A proper noun is always capitalized. Examples of common nouns for the proper noun 'Mayon Volcano' are: volcano mountain landform feature
most of the time because it depends on what the scientist is studying
No. Only a census can ACCURATELY predict the outcomes: a random sample cannot.
Not always volcanos can happen at anytime