yes
There is only one scientific method, however, there is some flexibility in the way in which it is used.
false
Yes.
Yes. They do.
A scientific prediction, or hypothesis, is always stated using the "if, then" method. IF this happens, THEN this will result.
There is only one scientific method, however, there is some flexibility in the way in which it is used.
Scientists who understand how science works will always be on guard against their own possible bias. And of course, there is always peer review. Scientists who do exhibit bias will eventually be challenged by other scientists.
false
true
Yes.
Yes, scientists are always looking for new answers.
Yes. They do.
Scientific debates let scientists work out different views. Debates present differing ideas and views with that scientist's "scientific evidence", but scientists do not always agree and cannot always resolve the problem(s). Debates are like a think tank. They generate more ideas than declaring one solution or answer.
the first step is always the hypothesis but i say it's the identification of the problem which comes first... that's what they taught us in school...
A scientific prediction, or hypothesis, is always stated using the "if, then" method. IF this happens, THEN this will result.
Because they were always curious about things... :))
Scientists are not resistant to change, they are always ready to look at new evidence for scientific theories. But science develops by looking at new ideas and rejecting the ones that can be proved wrong, so this is why scientists always have to look at new ideas when they come along and try to disprove them. The scientific theories that last are the ones that could never be disproved.