Well some people do think that they do but other people just underline them
Yes, I believe so. If not, you only need to put it into italics.
No, that wouldn't be necessary. Here is the exception. If you are using an appositive phrase, you will need to use a comma before and after the song title. Example: In their most recent song, "The God that Failed," Metallica rocks.
there are no songs, she is japaneese, so are her makers, there for there is no need for english songs ^^ i wish there were though!
numb by linkin park
All you need to do is memorize the songs and then start practicing it and soon enough you can rap it fast!
Well, it doesn't need quotation marks but it does have to be capitalized and it has to be in italics. If it's a name of the article in a magazine, then you have to underline it too. That's what I think.
no! if you have seen other booksthey don't. ()_() (-_-)
( ) are parenthesis. You never put a title between those. Sometimes you would use quotation marks " " . But usually a title is underlined. No it needs to be in quatation marks.
The comma goes before the closing quotation mark when it's part of the title of an article within a sentence, as in "The New York Times," reported on the topic.
Yes, I believe so. If not, you only need to put it into italics.
I need to add quotation marks in that sentence
No. It should be in italics like a book title. You can indicate italics by underlining.
Quotation marks are used for direct quotes only. Indirect quotes are paraphrased and do not need quotation marks.
Yes.
no only quotes
Typically, if the words are your own you do not need to enclose them in quotation marks. However, if you specifically mean the words to be understood as dialogue, you should put quotation marks around them.
Typically, it is only titles of works that need either underlining italics, or quotation marks. Titles of groups are just proper nouns, so they'll just need capital letters.