Far less dangerous. This is due to the unliklihood of being killed by radiation exposure versus the side effects of hydrocarbon plants. Even wind chops up birds that happen through the blades. Also hydrocrabon systems must be on standby (and running constantly) when the wind stops. Until someone develops the magnum sized flywheel to store energy while the wind isn't blowing.
Lung cancer and smog and the like are known and quantifiable. radiation exposure is very rare and usally very weak.
Even Fukishama will cause more deaths from stress and worry than it has the chance to cause by actually exposing anyone to fallout. The bark is worse than the bite and the media is very apt to make it out to be the plague when cars kill 40,000 in the US alone in a year. Those should be banned.
One use is in nuclear power plants to produce steam and turn turbines to generate electricity.Nuclear bombs ^.^
Nuclear power stations use local water supplies to cool their reactors and dump a lot of ambient heat into the environment as a result. Many also have concerns about the radiation in the plant and its effects on the environment should the plant become breached and the fact that the nuclear waste produced by the plant will remain dangerous for thousands of years wherever it ends up being stored. However, it should be noted that a gram of uranium can produce the equivalent energy of tons of coal, so nuclear plants produce reliable power without burning fossil fuels.
See the attached link for info on plants in France
because it doesn't create pollution and it is greener than coal and nuclear power plants :P
Uranium, typically enriched to ~3% Uranium-235.
No. Properly engineered nuclear power plants fail safe.
WHY
WHY
No, there is a small risk, but their energy output is much higher than that of other power sources
It contains a higher amount of radioactivity
not normally if it is designed correctly and the operators are following the rules.
by nuclear power ¬.¬
Nuclear power plants produce electricity by using nuclear energy
No, nuclear power plants are located in Oklahoma.
1. Nuclear power plants 2. Nuclear weaponsNuclear power plants
Britain does have nuclear power plants.
Power plants do not produce "dangerous radioactive waves" or "dangerous electromagnetic waves" or "dangerous subsonic sounds" or anything of that nature. Coal fired plants may produces some sulfur dioxide but that's about it.Nuclear power plants produce some radioactive waste but the major danger arises from the operation in the US of such plants which is aimed at producing plutonium for bombs.