Best Answer

Uranium, typically enriched to ~3% Uranium-235.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which element is the main fuel in nuclear power plants?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Continue Learning about General Science

What element is used as fuel in nuclear power plants?

uranium and plutonium are the two most commonly used fuels in nuclear power plants. when i first looked it up using this site, it completely failed. after finding my answer on Wikipedia i came back here to enrich the site's knowledge and help others

Can nuclear power plants produce material that could be converted?

Nuclear energy is released from the nucleus when U235 fissions, it appears initially as kinetic energy of the fission fragments, these are then stopped in the fuel material and turned to thermal energy. We can't use the nuclear energy directly.

How many people have died due to accidents and pollution from nuclear power plants compared to how many have died due to accidents and pollution from coal power plants?

There technically is no "pollution" from nuclear power, the only by product is steam. The transport and storage of spent nuclear fuel is extremely secure and safe. The only time we are in danger of nuclear radiation are if the reactor vessels that house the nuclear rods are damaged or melt....which is extremely rare and only happens with a massive failure in the chain of events that govern and sustain the supply (in theory, a deliberate attack on a power plant would also cause a spill, too. Yet, so far, that hasn't happened). In the end, thousands of people die every year from the burning of fossil fuels, where as virtually nobody dies from the use of nuclear power. Over 85 of France's power usage comes from nuclear power, after all.

What is an environmental consequences of nuclear energy?

Short answer: Contamination is a risk. Also, if you factor in all the work required to set nuclear energy into motion, you will see that it also contributes to adding carbon to the atmosphere. Nuclear energy is not carbon-free as many believe. Mining and extraction costs carbon in fossil fuel; transportation costs carbon in fossil fuel; processing costs carbon in fossil fuel; building the nuclear power station costs carbon in fossil fuel. Then there's the question of highly radioactive waste storage for hundreds of thousands of years, leaks into the environment, coastal flooding of nuclear power stations like Sizewell. And the question of the added energy from splitting atoms which is extra to solar radiation and thus adds to the net energy input to the planet [an issue never even addressed]. It takes at least ten years to build a nuclear station so no quick fix, and decommissioning is even longer. It also costs billions, a price no government could hope to get taxpayers to pay, yet private industry won't fork out that sort of money. It's a pipe dream, something to use against those who argue renewable power is the only way to go. It is true that nuclear energy is not purely carbonless. However, once you factor in the production and transportation costs, neither are solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, tidal, or hydroelectric power. One aspect that all of these energy sources, including nuclear, has in common are that once they are functioning they are emitting less CO2 into our atmosphere than coal and oil. Regardless of your feelings about coal and oil, they are not found on the earth in limitless supply, so therefore we as a society need to begin developing more renewable energy. Obviously there will be environmental impact of mining the uranium (or another element thorium) that will be used to fuel the power plant. Uranium mines are under very strict guidelines that will help to prevent the surrounding mining area from any overly adverse affects (probably no more than what the uranium was doing naturally). Furthermore, nuclear power plants emit less radiation to the surrounding areas than coal fire power plants because the nuclear power plants are built more durably. The radioactive waste is a concern because right now our federal government will not allow this waste to be refurbished to be used again in a nuclear reactor like France does. Right now each power plant maintains their own waste. Decommissioning nuclear power plants is expensive but this is necessary in order to protect the environment . Overall, nuclear is one of many, not the only, solutions that our country needs to progress towards.

How many fossil fuel power plants are there in the US?

There are at least 600 coal fired power plants in the US, providing 31.2% of U.S. electric capacity (as of 2005).

Related questions

What element is used to make fuel for nuclear power plants?

B. Uranium

What is the fuel nuclear power plants?


Uranium-235 is used to fuel nuclear power plants What is the main use of uranium-235?

That is the main use, to fuel nuclear power plants

Is Silver used as a fuel in nuclear power plants?


Which substances is a fuel used in nuclear power plants?


Why is uranium used in nuclear power plants?

Uranium is used as nuclear fuel in nuclear power plants because the fission of uranium atom release a formidable quantity of energy.

Is uranium used in nuclear power plants?

Yes, uranium is the most important nuclear fuel.

Can plutonium be used in nuclear power plants?

Yes, plutonium is a very important nuclear fuel.

How is uranium involved in nuclear reactors?

Uranium is now the most important nuclear fuel for nuclear power plants.

Is chromium used as fuel nuclear power plants?

No, chromium has no fissile properties for use as fuel

What Power plant that uses uranium as a source of energy?

Uranium (or plutonium) is a source of energy (nuclear fuel) in nuclear power plants.

Energy is produced in nuclear power plants from the controlled fission of?

U-235 isotope. (That is, of Uranium. It is a radioactive element.) The atoms are stocked in fuel rods, and the fission begins!