Want this question answered?
Using nuclear fission, generators are turned.
Choosing the correct location for a nuclear power plant is important since it is supposed to be near a water and near the raw materials.
Usually very, often safer than one near a coal plant.
Technically, anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant and, i suppose, gets permission, can use nuclear energy as a cheaper alternative to electricity
No. They are both cities that are near the now abandoned nuclear plant that had a disaster in 1986. Pripyat was built for workers to live in. It is nearer to the Chernobyl power plant than Chernobyl is.
If you live near a nuclear power plant you might be in danger if it exploded. But the engineers are taking immense precautions to prevent any faults that would cause a plant to explode so you're safe.
In an IGLOO in Alaska, or near the Fukishima nuclear power plant in Japan.
Palo Verdes near Phoenix, AZ is one.
For this, you can blame public media,nuclear power can be good or bad but, if the people get scared they will not want to live near or go anywhere near them. Take the recent nuclear news for example
Chernobyl wad the nuclear power plant, built by the Soviet Union. It was near the city if Pripyat, which was built in 1979 by the Soviet government to support the power plant.
The USA built the first nuclear power plant, EBR-1, near Arco, Idaho, which was rated at about 100 KW of power. First power production took place on December 20, 1951. The former USSR built the first nuclear power plant that supplied a power grid. That occurred on June 27, 1954. It was the Obninsk Power Plant, and produced around 5 MW of power.
In an IGLOO in Alaska, or near the Fukishima nuclear power plant in Japan.