0
Technically, there are no "Roman Catholic" Orders: It's just Catholic, not Roman Catholic. Roman is an epithet first commonly used in England after the protestant revolt to describe the Catholic Church. It is never used by the official Catholic Church.
.
Apostolicae Curae declared Anglican Orders null and void, NOT Catholic Orders.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When was Apostolicae Curae created?
Apostolicae Curae was created in 1896.
Why does Apostolicae Curae mean that Roman Catholic orders are ALSO absolutely null and utterly void?
Apostolicae Curae, (which is attached at the link below) specifically addressed the validly of Anglican Orders as being invalid as the intention was missing from the form in the Edwardian Ordinal which was used for over 100 years, so that when the Anglicans corrected their Ordinal, there were no validly consecrated Bishops with which to reinstate the Apostolic Succession. Apostolicae Curae has absolutely no relevance to Catholic Orders (please note that there are no "Roman" Catholic orders, this being nothing more than an English slur on the Catholic Church) as a) it does not address Catholic Orders, and b) Our Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, in sending the Holy Spirit to guide the Church "always" specifically guaranteed that His Church would remain free from error until the end of time. So the question, as asked, makes no sense.
Can a Catholic priest con-celebrate with an Anglican priest?
On September 18, 1896, Pope Leo XIII issued Apostolicae Curae, which was the papal bull on the Nullity of Anglican Orders (see link below). Thus, Anglican have no valid Orders and are unable to consecrate the Holy Eucharist. Notwithstanding that, an Anglican priest is not in communion with the Catholic Church and thus a Catholic priest would not be permitted to celebrate with them anyway.
If confirmed into the Church of England is this recognized by the Catholic Church?
Yes as a Christian, not as a member of the Catholic Faith.As a Anglican you are Catholic yet Protestant.Roman Catholic AnswerPope Leo XIII, in his 1896 bull Apostolicae Curae ruled that Anglican Orders were invalid, i.e. they had lost Apostologic Succession through their translation of the Ordination ceremony, thus none of their orders were valid: in other words, they had no valid bishops, priests, or deacons. By virtue of this fact, NONE of their sacraments (save Baptism) are valid. To be validly confirmed, one must be baptised and confirmed by a Bishop or a priest appointed by him. So, no, if you were confirmed in the Church of England, it would not be recognized. Sacraments are real, they confer a real grace that is signified by the outward sign. A protestant confirmation would just be the outward sign, without the inward grace.
Can a Catholic receive communion in Episcopalian church?
No.Episcopalians and any member of the Anglican communion (and I am an Anglican) would welcome a Roman Catholic at the Lord's table for communion, but the teaching of the Church of Rome dictates that Catholics should not receive in another denomination.However, if the Roman Catholic in question still wished to receive in the Episcopalian Church, against the teachings of his own church then he would not be refused the sacrament.Roman Catholic AnswerCatholics may not and can not receive Holy Communion in an Episcopal Church. They may not as receiving Communion means that you believe everything that the Church teaches, so receiving Communion in an Episcopal Church would be an act of apostasy. They can not as Pope Leo XIII in his Bull, Apostolicae Curae issued on 15 Sept 1896 ruled that Anglican (Episcopal) Orders were null and void: in other words, they do not have a valid priesthood and thus cannot confect the Eucharist.
Describe one important difference between Roman Catholic and Anglican priests?
Easy, Catholic clergy are bishops, priests, and deacons who have been ordained into the sacrificial priesthood of Christ through the Apostolic succession, and thus carry Our Blessed Lord's mandate to minister to His people. Anglican clergy are protestants who lost apostolic succession and do not have a proper sacrificial priesthood. Please see Apostolicae Curae issued by Pope Leo XIII in 1896 on the validly of Anglican Orders:http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13curae.htm
What is the difference between Catholic ordination and an Anglo ordination?
Catholic Ordination is a sacrament instituted by Our Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, and administered by a Bishop, who has his consecration in the Apostolic succession. It ontologically changes the man thus ordained. . Anglican ordination is a similar ceremony that institutes a man OR a woman into one of the three orders of protestant clergy in the Anglican Communion. Anglican ordination does not confer an ontological change, and this was ruled infallibly by Pope Leo XIII in Apostoloicae Curae, attached below.
What has the author Guilelmus Dahms written?
Guilelmus Dahms has written: 'Curae Hirtianae'
How is the Catholic church different from the Church of England?
The Catholic Church is the Mystical Body of Christ which, obviously, was established by Him, primarily from His side as He hung dead on the cross and was pierced by a lance, and blood and water flowed out - representing the sacraments of Baptism and the Eucharist. Our Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, appointed St. Peter as It's first visible head (the first "Pope") in St. Matthew's Gospel 16:17-19, and guaranteed that it would remain as the infallible way to heaven until the end of the world. He sent the Holy Spirit to guide it always. The Church of England is a protestant ecclesial community which was established by King Henry VIII, his daughter, Elizabeth I, as their own "church" when they could not abide the commands of Our Blessed Lord given through His Church. It is entirely a human institution, howbeit with some Catholic "trappings", but Pope Leo XIII ruled in Apostolicae Curae on 18 September 1896 that its Orders are null and void, thus unlike the Orthodox Church, it is no "Church" as properly understood, at all.
Can a person be confirmed in two different religions?
If you mean can a person be confirmed as both a Catholic and a Protestant then yes they can, because these are two different denominations of the same religion - Christianity, although why anyone should wish to be confirmed twice is rather strange. Confirmation simply confirms the vows made by your Godparents on your behalf at infant baptism. These vows are the belief in God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, a repentance of sin, and a turning to Christ for salvation. Despite some differences between the Catholic Church and the Protestants, all Christian churches (unless sects like JWs or Mormons) accept the Trinity, repentance as a way to be right with God and Christ as the way to salvation. So confirmation twice in two Christian denominations is unnecessary.However if the confirmation is to take place in two actual religions (like Christianity and Islam, or Islam and Buddhism) then this is not possible (even if they had a 'confirmation' - type service) as the differences between each religion are soo great that one could not promise to adhere to one without turning their back on another. You cannot worship Allah and Krishna unless you pay lip service to one of the religions!AnswerFrom the point of view of the Roman Catholic Church regarding the treatment of sacraments and theology, you cannot be confirmed in two different religions. This because the sacrament of confirmation leaves a permanent character upon the soul and thus can only be received once. While materially you can, i.e. you can undergo the ceremony of confirmation many times as in going through the motions, the Church only recognizes a confirmation that has been administered by a bishop with orders accepted as valid by the Church. Protestant confirmations are not recognized and are deemed both illicit and invalid as Catholics do not accept Protestant bishops as having valid orders. The hallmark in this decision was determined by pope Leo XIII in his bull Apostolicae Curae of September 15, 1896 which determined that Anglican bishops had changed the sacrament too long before restoring it for the succession of valid orders in that denomination. Other denominations have made no attempt to restore their orders to the original pre-Reformation form. On a convert from one of these denominatios a Catholic bishop will administer the sacrament of confirmation to the candidate for the first time based on the above ruling. A confirmation received from an Orthodox bishop is considered illicit but valid, as the Orthodox have retained valid orders and thus the Roman Catholic Church will receive the confirmation as completed. The Roman Catholic Church considers any valid confirmation to be Her own, and thus one is confirmed in the Catholic Faith so long as the sacrament is valid, no matter what the allegiance of the administering bishop.
What's the difference between Anglo and Roman Catholicism?
This is a nickname for the most extreme elements of the High Church faction in the Church of England, which corresponds to the Episcopalians in America. Typically, Anglo-Catholics have attached much importance to ritual and to the priesthood, which is seen as the 'officer caste', as it were. They have tended to imitate the Roman Catholics, but they don't give allegiance to the Pope.
Is the Anglican church Catholic or protestant?
Both and neither.Although the Church of England broke ties from Rome in the 16th century it is not considered "protestant" in the same way as "Presbyterians" are.The Church of England (Anglican Church) is connected to its ancient Catholic heritage. The Anglican Church Celebrates the sacraments, and most importantly the Holy Eucharist.AnswerChurch of England was established by Henry VIII. The critical distinction is that the Pope is head of the Catholic Church whereas the present King of Queen of England as the head of the Church of England. The present head of the Church of England is her Britannic Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.3rd AnswerWhilst the Church of England was certainly ,'Established,' by Henry the 8th, it was simply a gesture that legitimised, as it were, the custom and practice of some 1500 years.The Church of England was the Catholic Communion in this country and the Edict of Milan [311/13.] made the Catholic Church legal throughout the Roman Empire it began a move that assumed the establishment of the Church throughout the Roman Realm!In Britain, then England this attitude grew, through the moves in early Synods of the Saxon Church and was carried on till Henry put it in to a law. The Monarch was always the Civil Head of the Church as being the Chief magistrate and this was just as real with the papacy in his own country in Northern Italy where the Bishop of Rome held civil power as well as religious authority!As to the head of the Catholic Church? We are made members of the Catholic Church by baptism, it is referred to as the Body of Christ and we as members of Christ and Children of God! The Pope is not the Head of the Catholic Church, an error, but he is the Patriarch of the West! This is an honorary administrative post given to him , as Bishop of Rome, just as the Bishop of Constantinople was made Patriarch of the East, [for fully political reasons in both cases,] by the Ecumenical Councils.The church of England or Anglican church is not Catholic. it is Protestant, and the Queen is NOT the chief magistrate, the Pope is acknowledged by the world as the Head of The Catholic Church, if he is not who is ?
