answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The losing party to a case that has exhausted its lower court appeals and has preserved questions of federal or constitutional law has the right to appeal to the US Supreme Court. If the case only involves state statutes or state constitutional issues, or if the party's attorney failed to preserve (raise as an issue) federal questions at each step of the appeals process, the case usually falls outside the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and will not be heard. Similarly, if the losing party fails to petition the Supreme Court within the statutory time frame for appeals, the case will not be heard.

The Supreme Court is not a trier of fact (unless hearing a case under original jurisdiction), but an appellate court. That means they don't review evidence or (most) procedural errors, nor do they make a finding of guilt or innocence in any case accepted for appeal. The purpose of the Court is to ensure the law and Constitution are being applied fairly and consistently. If the Court reverses an appeals court decision, the case will be remanded (sent back) to either the appeals court or trial court for disposition.

Bear in mind that a right of appeal is not the same as a right to be heard. The US Supreme Court receives approximately 10,000 petitions for writ of certiorari each year, but can only review 1-2% of the cases presented. In order for the Court to exercise its judicial discretion to accept a case for review, the case must be of national importance and/or must involve incorrect application of precedents or constitutional principles. The Supreme Court is more likely to review cases under circumstances where Circuit courts have issued contradictory opinions on similar issues.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Yes and no. Yes, a person who exhausts all lower appeals has the right to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court; however, if the person hasn't preserved (raised at the trial and on appeal) one or more significant federal questions (constitutional issues) directly related to his or her case, the petition will be summarily rejected. Approximately 70% of all petitions for writ of certiorari are filed in error, and lack proper grounds for appeal.

The petitioner needs to be aware that the Supreme Court will not review the case on merit, and will generally not take cases that simply allege errors or misapplied laws, unfair as that may seem. The Court's primary mission is to ensure the Constitution is being interpreted and applied correctly (in their opinion) and consistently via statutes and lower court decisions.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

No. If a person has merely been accused of a crime, any appeal is premature. The accused must actually be convicted of something before beginning the appellate process.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

No. No one has a "right" to have his or her case heard by the US Supreme Court; the Supreme Court has complete discretion over its docket.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Does a person convicted of a crime have the right to appeal directly to the US Supreme Court?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

In Ohio what type of case must be granted an appeal in the Supreme Court of Ohio?

In Ohio - or any state that still allows capital punishment - a person who has been convicted and sentenced to death has a mandatory right of appeal to the state supreme court (or its equivalent).


Can you appeal a criminal case?

Yes, If the convicted person is un-happy with their conviction they may appeal to 'The Court of Appeals'.


How will a convicted permanent resident stay in the US after serving his term?

Generally the person who is convicted of a felony will have their permanent residency revoked and he or she will be deported to their country of origin. The individual does have the right to appeal and if an appeal is taken into consideration the person will be allowed to remain in the US until a hearing and a decision is made.


Can the US Supreme Court send you to jail?

No, certainly not directly. The US Supreme Court does not try civil or criminal cases and doesn't make decisions about a defendant's guilt or innocence; that's the job of the judge and jury in the trial court. A criminal defendant would have to be convicted and have exhausted all other appeals before he or she could petition the Court to review the case. In other words, the person would already be convicted and sentenced,probably several years earlier.If the US Supreme Court agreed to review the case, their decision about the constitutional issues raised could potentially result in release from jail, a new trial, or a change in sentencing, etc. If, for some unknown, hypothetical reason, the courts allowed the convicted person to remain or go free pending the slim possibility of a successful Supreme Court appeal, and the Supreme Court upheld the conviction, then the Court may be considered indirectly responsible for sending the person to jail.While this may seem theoretically possible, it never happens in real life.


What is the highest court in Georgia that person can eventually appeal to when break law?

The highest court in any state is the state's Supreme Court. So, the Georgia Supreme Court.


How does a death penalty case get to the supreme court?

The appeals system is a little complicated, but essentially: the person who has received the death penalty would need to appeal to the Supreme Court and then the Supreme Court would have to grant a writ of certiorari. The "complicated" part comes from the fact that it would have been appealed to lower courts (the state Supreme Court, or a Circuit Court of Appeals) before the US Supreme Court would agree to hear the appeal.


If someones been wrongly convicted of grand theft auto and the person who done it confessed dont they have to drop the charges against the innocent man?

No. If a person has been convicted, it is no longer possible to "drop" the charges. The convicted person must seek to have his conviction overturned, either through an appeal or a new trial, depending on the circumstances and on the state's procedural law. At a new trial, he would be able to introduce evidence of the confession of another person as exculpatory evidence.


How is the death penalty protected?

If by "protected" it is meant what options does the person who is sentenced to death have, all such sentencing is immediately subject to appeal. In the US all convicted persons who receive the death sentence can file an appeal as many times as is permitted by the highest state appellate court and/or the US Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court has also ruled that any law that automatically imposes the death penalty is unconstitutional. In the US voters decide whether or not to allow capital punishment. The federal government institutes the death penalty when specified crimes such as the killing of a federal law enforcement officer are committed.


Will the supreme court most likely grant a hearing when a case involves the possibility that an innocent person has been wrongly convicted of a crime?

an issue that is being decided inconsistently by the lower courts


What do states do with wrongly convicted?

Your term "Wrongly convicted" covers a whole lot of different areas. Each state has its own procedures. At the trial a person is found guilty or not guilty. (In Europe there is also a verdict of Innocent.) There is a possible appeal. After appeal review, and sentencing, the conviction is final. A person is then convicted. After that post conviction relief is possible. If new evidence is discovered that could have been presented in a trial, the prisoner submits a petition to the trial court. (It has a technical name. There are many possible petitions. See a lawyer for your state.) If the judge goofed up, there are motions to the appeal court. (See a lawyer for the technical rules for your state.) If all else fails, your state has a provision for a pardon. The various state legislatures have generally made provision for payment for the time spent in prison for persons wrongfully convicted. (As a result, Judges will sometimes have a person plead guilty to a small crime in exchange for time served!)


Can a person declared dead be held for any past crimes?

No, when a person dies, he is considered innocent, except for any crimes he has already been convicted of. And even then, if his convictions are under appeal and he dies, then the Appeals automatically rule in favor of the defendant. A dead person may not be prosecuted posthumously.


When a person in a criminal trial is found guilty that person is?

The person in a criminal trial is the defendant. When found guilty, the person is convicted and sentenced. The person then becomes an inmate or convict in the prison system.