* Environmental Degradation * All the steps in the complex process of creating nuclear energy entail environmental hazards. * The mining of uranium, as well as its refining and enrichment, and the production of plutonium produce radioactive isotopes that contaminate the surrounding area, including the groundwater, air, land, plants, and equipment. As a result, humans and the entire ecosystem are adversely and profoundly affected. * Some of these radioactive isotopes are extraordinarily long-lived, remaining toxic for hundreds of thousands of years. Presently, we are only beginning to observe and experience the consequences of producing nuclear energy
* Nuclear Waste * Nuclear waste is produced in many different ways. There are wastes produced in the reactor core, wastes created as a result of radioactive contamination, and wastes produced as a byproduct of uranium mining, refining, and enrichment. The vast majority of radiation in nuclear waste is given off from spent fuel rods. * A typical reactor will generate 20 to 30 tons of high-level nuclear waste annually. There is no known way to safely dispose of this waste, which remains dangerously radioactive until it naturally decays. * The rate of decay of a radioactive isotope is called its half-life, the time in which half the initial amount of atoms present takes to decay. The half-life of Plutonium-239, one particularly lethal component of nuclear waste, is 24,000 years. * The hazardous life of a radioactive element (the length of time that must elapse before the material is considered safe) is at least 10 half-lives. Therefore, Plutonium-239 will remain hazardous for at least 240,000 years. The spent fuel waste would be a serious cause of pollution if released to the environment. This is why it is so important to control it. It is not difficult to keep it safe, but if we want to protect humanity in the future, it should be stored so that even if civilization breaks down and monitoring ceases, it remains safe.
no nly thermal pollution
Nuclear energy ! pros- causes almost no green house gasses, & pollution. cons-can cause melt downs.
Because it does not cause pollution by producing greenhouse gases and contributing to global warming
nuclear energy
Nuclear waste pollution can cause people and animals to suffer and most likely die from its poisons
energy pollution
Not much pollution unless there is a nuclear reaction.
It can cause pollution to the planet .
Geothermal energy is green because it doesn't cause pollution.
A few are solar, nuclear, biomass, hydro power
no. Nuclear plants can explode potentially killing thousands of people. Besides the explosion, a nuclear explosion would cause radiation to linger, killing off, or mutating thousands more at a greater distance. Nuclear energy can also cause nuclear waste to form, and this must properly be put away. However, nuclear energy has saved/created more lives than kill it because it is able to create large amounts of energy, without pollution and power many homes.
Nuclear power plants do not cause thermal polution.