No.
Sugar would not belong to the vitamins group.
Sugar, carbohydrates, protein, enzymes, vitamins and minerals.
no sugar but plenty of vitamins
Refined sugar is a pure carbohydrate which provides no vitamins or minerals to the body, however, molasses, which is also made from sugar cane and is not as drastically refined, is an excellent source of iron.
The plasma carries the minerals/ vitamins/ sugar around the body. All the things are dissolved into it.
Refined sugar robs your body of it's B vitamin stores.
It has a healthier Vitamins and no sugar on it.
Sugar beet is "nutritious" in the same way that pure sugar is - a good source of calories, but relatively devoid of vitamins and minerals.
Every food has some sort of "nutrient" in it. And most foods have some vitamin or mineral content (however small this may be). The only exception is white sugar - this has no vitamins (wheras brown sugar has some vitamin/mineral content), but it does have nutrient value (it's full of calories). All fruits and vegetables have vitamins in, white bread and breakfast cerals are fortified with vitamins and minerals (have them added). Plain white flour is also now fortifed with vitamins and minerals. Meat, fish and dairy all contain vitamins and minerals. It's difficult to find a food without vitamins in, with the exception of white sugar.
veins
depends on the calories, vitamins, and amounts of sugar
vegetables because vegetables has more vitamins and minerals and less sugar and fruit has a little bit more sugar than vegetables and some fruits don't have ALL the vitamins and minerals but vegetables do.