Yes. Energy that enters a black hole, such as light, becomes part of its mass.
I don't see why not. Every mass has an associated energy, and vice versa.
Same as the force between any two objects in the universe, even if one of them happens to be a black hole ...Force = G m1m2/R2G = the universal gravitational constantm1 = mass of one objectm2 = mass of the other objectR = the distance between themIn theory, this formula may break down and become inaccurate at distances close to the black hole. It's really hard to check it out because, well, nobody has ever seen a black hole ...But at ordinary typical everyday astronomical distances, this formula is just as accurate for black holes as it is for the gravitational force between two bowling balls.
The material sucked in to a black hole becomes part of the black hole - that is, a black hole crushes matter to an nearly no size, at all.
A black hole is called a black hole because due to its density and therefore intense gravity, nothing, not even light, can escape it. Though it has extreme mass, it is not a light source, and it will not reflect any light, so it appears as a "black hole" in the universe.As a black hole has massive gravity, light from objects behind it will "bend" around the black hole and an observer will see what is called gravitational lensing. The effect of the lensing will be greatly pronounced because a black hole deforms space-time dramatically. A black hole is a point in space where something is, but because the "thing" that is there generates extreme gravity, it will not be visible under any conditions. It was natural to apply the term black hole to this phenomenon.Because, the huge gravitational forces inside the black hole ensure nothing - not even light - can escape.
No. A black hole will remain a black hole. A neutron star is a remnant of a star not massive enough to become a black hole.
A black hole is a type of star with excessive gravity. Here are some sentences.The star was sucked into the black hole close by.A black hole will even absorb light.The scientist is studying a black hole.
A black hole is not a vertebrate or an invertebrate. Those terms apply to animals. A black hole is not an animal, nor is it even alive.
Perhaps you mean Schwarzschild metric? I have never heard of the Shorelchild metric and cannot find anything relating to it. A black hole with a Schwarszchild metric is a black hole with no angular velocity (Non-rotational) and no charge. Since it's impossible to perceive a black hole it looks no different from any other black hole.
The size of a black hole is a meaningless quantity. The black hole itself, meaning the matter contained within, is infinitely small. However black holes can be defined by their schwartzchild radius which is the size of the event horizon. Look the equation for it up somewhere.
The collapses star gets squeezed by collapses gas and turns into a black hole.
A Schwarzschild black hole is a non-rotating black hole. The Kerr black hole is a rotating black hole. Since the latter is more complicated to describe, it was developed much later.A Schwarzschild black hole is a non-rotating black hole. The Kerr black hole is a rotating black hole. Since the latter is more complicated to describe, it was developed much later.A Schwarzschild black hole is a non-rotating black hole. The Kerr black hole is a rotating black hole. Since the latter is more complicated to describe, it was developed much later.A Schwarzschild black hole is a non-rotating black hole. The Kerr black hole is a rotating black hole. Since the latter is more complicated to describe, it was developed much later.
Its density becomes infinite. Except that what you have described is a black hole and the ordinary laws of physics and maths do not apply in or within the event horizon of a black hole.
Same as the force between any two objects in the universe, even if one of them happens to be a black hole ...Force = G m1m2/R2G = the universal gravitational constantm1 = mass of one objectm2 = mass of the other objectR = the distance between themIn theory, this formula may break down and become inaccurate at distances close to the black hole. It's really hard to check it out because, well, nobody has ever seen a black hole ...But at ordinary typical everyday astronomical distances, this formula is just as accurate for black holes as it is for the gravitational force between two bowling balls.
technical it is becuase E=mc2 is energy =mass2 times the speed of light if this is true then how can a little man dominate a big man if the big man has more mass then he should have more energy then the little man.now what he left out of his equation is somthing called sprit because sprit is the mass of the universe, so the real equation is:E=MP2*speed of darknesssorry forgot ever been told that nothing travels fast then light well thats also a lie. ever heard of a black hole that light cant escape.....must be traveling fast.
A black hole originated as a star, that is, the star converted to a black hole.
The material sucked in to a black hole becomes part of the black hole - that is, a black hole crushes matter to an nearly no size, at all.
If you fall into a black hole, you'll go into the black hole and nowhere else.
probs black hole