0
No
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
If the big bang did rip the universe why are'nt we being sucked in it like a black hole does?
Because it didn't rip the universe, obviously. The theory of black holes state that as a star collapses in on it's self all of it's matter is around the size of a baseball, all of the stars mass into that small of space rip's the very fabric of the universe forming a black hole. My question was if a black hole can rip the very fabric of the universe and it's only the mass of the star host then why did'nt the big bang if everything we have ever known or seen was the size of a baseball? Well, technically, the big bang has infinate mass, and since there was nothing really to compare it to, it was the size of everything, and nothing. If the big bang was a black hole, and if it ripped the universe, then the universe would have imploded upon itself before it was even created.
What similarity is there between the big chill theory and the big rip theory?
There is a small similarity in that they both theorise the Universe will continue to expand. The outcome, is where they differ. In the big freeze theory, the Universe just continues to expand until all matter is used up and becomes a lifeless and very cold place. In the Big Rip theory, the Universe itself is actually ripped apart. All bound objects are pulled apart. See related links for more information.
Will are universe end?
It depends on the theory you follow. The big bang theory talks of a universe with an end like the big rip. It even talks of the big crunch where the universes mass gets so massive that the force of the explosion can no longer push atoms appart and instead the gravitational force of the universe gets so strong it pulls itself back together into a point of infinite smallness that has no dimensional value or any time-space or physical rules. Steady state theories and the sting and the m-theory speak of a universe where it had no beginning, so therefore it will have no climax/middle, and it will have no end because it does not exist.
Is it true that the big bang theory states the universe will never end?
No it is not true the big bang theory state the universe will never end.The big bang theory currently has 4 proposals for the final end to the universe. Which theory is correct is unclear at this time.1) The Big CrunchIf there is sufficient mass in the universe and dark energy either weakens or is insufficient to over come the gravity the universe expansion will slow, stop then the universe will start to collapse. The universe will get more and more dense until it ends in a big singularity like the big bang but in reverse.2) The Static EndIf there is just enough mass (less than the big crunch) and dark energy weakens or is insufficient to overcome the gravity. The universe will eventually stop expanding but only when the galaxies are so far apart that the gravity will be unable to contract the universe. Eventually all the stars will burn out and no new stars will be made and the universe will eventually go dark. All that will remain is radiation left over from the big bang and dead stars.3) The Big Freeze.If the is not enough mass to stop the expansion or dark energy is sufficient to keep the universe expanding. Then the universe will keep expanding for ever. Eventually the stars will all go out and the radiation from the big bang will have to fill a greater and greater area and the universe will get colder and colder. Galaxies made up of stellar remnants will move further and further apart.4) The Big RipIf there is not enough mass to stop the expansion and a lot of dark energy. The universe will expand at a faster and faster rate. As it gets faster firstly galaxies will be ripped apart. Then the star remnants will be ripped apart, then the matter will be ripped apart and even eventually space time itself will rip.
What would the big rip do to a black hole?
It would rip it to shreds like the rest of the universe.
How is the big bang theory different from the oscillating theory?
The Oscillation Hypothesis (despite the common use, neither version is actually a Theory) is that after the Universe expands so far, gravity pulls it back to a singularity and a new Big Bang starts it all over again, possibly with an entirely different set of constants and physical laws. This view is losing support because recent investigation has revealed that the Universe is not slowing down from the Big Bang, but is in fact, speeding up a little. The latest wrinkle is that Everything will not end in a Big Crunch, but will get so thin that it will just fade away, the so-called "Big Rip."
If the big bang did rip the universe why are'nt we being sucked in it like a black hole does?
Because it didn't rip the universe, obviously. The theory of black holes state that as a star collapses in on it's self all of it's matter is around the size of a baseball, all of the stars mass into that small of space rip's the very fabric of the universe forming a black hole. My question was if a black hole can rip the very fabric of the universe and it's only the mass of the star host then why did'nt the big bang if everything we have ever known or seen was the size of a baseball? Well, technically, the big bang has infinate mass, and since there was nothing really to compare it to, it was the size of everything, and nothing. If the big bang was a black hole, and if it ripped the universe, then the universe would have imploded upon itself before it was even created.
What similarity is there between the big chill theory and the big rip theory?
There is a small similarity in that they both theorise the Universe will continue to expand. The outcome, is where they differ. In the big freeze theory, the Universe just continues to expand until all matter is used up and becomes a lifeless and very cold place. In the Big Rip theory, the Universe itself is actually ripped apart. All bound objects are pulled apart. See related links for more information.
What are the release dates for Lip 'Em and Rip 'Em - 2010 The Chatty Chatty Bass Bang?
Lip 'Em and Rip 'Em - 2010 The Chatty Chatty Bass Bang was released on: USA: 29 March 2008
What are the big-banged big-crunched and big-ripped configurations of the universe?
The big bang theory describes the universe as originating from a single point in a large explosion which would have occurred roughly 14 billion years ago, and is a widely accepted theory because it seems to fit observations, particularly a measurable outward expansion of matter in the universe. The big crunch is somewhat the opposite, it describes a theory for the fate of the universe where gravitational force eventually overcomes the outward expansion and all matter collapses back together. The big rip theory reflects another possible fate of the universe in which forces that cause expansion become so dominant that it eventually rips apart not only galaxies and stars, but atoms and particles themselves. This last theory hinges on properties of dark energy which appears to play a significant role in the expansion of the universe.
Will are universe end?
It depends on the theory you follow. The big bang theory talks of a universe with an end like the big rip. It even talks of the big crunch where the universes mass gets so massive that the force of the explosion can no longer push atoms appart and instead the gravitational force of the universe gets so strong it pulls itself back together into a point of infinite smallness that has no dimensional value or any time-space or physical rules. Steady state theories and the sting and the m-theory speak of a universe where it had no beginning, so therefore it will have no climax/middle, and it will have no end because it does not exist.
If a black hole rips the very fabric of the universe then why did'nt the big bang rip it as well Or did it?
a black hole is onlya colapsed nuetron star, not a rip in the universe you idiot. im only twelve and i know that. havent you heard of wikipedia, or google, or ask.com i mean seriously.
What would be required if one were to cross back through the singularity responsible for the Big Bang?
Answer 1: The Big Bang is just a theory - the most likely on the creation of reality. The big bang was like a black hole in reverse- a singularitie imploding. It wasn't really a bang either because there was no oxygen (medium) to carry the sound waves but it was big. To recreate this, you would (need) more power than (what) mere humans can harness or even generate, though it would require the right - exact electromagnetic frequency of neutrino energy exposed to photonic light. This would create a stable enough black hole hence the singularity, however to travel through the singularitie alive, well, you can't, the gravitational pull from it would rip you apart. Lovely to think of. Anyway - you can't scientifically speaking, but when it comes to sci- fi adventures then yes, that's what you need...
Is it true that the big bang theory states the universe will never end?
No it is not true the big bang theory state the universe will never end.The big bang theory currently has 4 proposals for the final end to the universe. Which theory is correct is unclear at this time.1) The Big CrunchIf there is sufficient mass in the universe and dark energy either weakens or is insufficient to over come the gravity the universe expansion will slow, stop then the universe will start to collapse. The universe will get more and more dense until it ends in a big singularity like the big bang but in reverse.2) The Static EndIf there is just enough mass (less than the big crunch) and dark energy weakens or is insufficient to overcome the gravity. The universe will eventually stop expanding but only when the galaxies are so far apart that the gravity will be unable to contract the universe. Eventually all the stars will burn out and no new stars will be made and the universe will eventually go dark. All that will remain is radiation left over from the big bang and dead stars.3) The Big Freeze.If the is not enough mass to stop the expansion or dark energy is sufficient to keep the universe expanding. Then the universe will keep expanding for ever. Eventually the stars will all go out and the radiation from the big bang will have to fill a greater and greater area and the universe will get colder and colder. Galaxies made up of stellar remnants will move further and further apart.4) The Big RipIf there is not enough mass to stop the expansion and a lot of dark energy. The universe will expand at a faster and faster rate. As it gets faster firstly galaxies will be ripped apart. Then the star remnants will be ripped apart, then the matter will be ripped apart and even eventually space time itself will rip.
Will the universe end in a big rip?
The "big rip" is a possibility that has been discussed, about the future fate of the Universe - not something that has been confirmed.
Why are binpets a rip off on biweevils?
its a big rip off thay shoud be 500 mulch
What would the big rip do to a black hole?
It would rip it to shreds like the rest of the universe.
