0
Does the use of DNA testing support or weaken the arguments against the death penalty?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
its because its not valid
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
The use of DNA testing can support arguments against the death penalty as it has revealed cases of wrongful convictions, highlighting flaws and errors in the criminal justice system. It underscores the possibility of irreversible mistakes, making the argument that the risk of executing an innocent person is too high. DNA testing has helped exonerate individuals on death row, strengthening the case against capital punishment.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are arguments for and against testing on animals?
Some of the arguments for are that it saves human lives, humans are superior to animals and the animals do not know that its happening. Some of the arguments against animal testing are its cruel to animals, animals have rights as well, you should treat animals the same as humans and theres alternatives out there to animal testing. On one side you have the for the other against. The opposing position against probably says it is nessacary for the animal testing because animals are about the same as humans. On the against position animal testing is wrong because it can cause the animal deadly pain and diseases. But I think there should be a human in the place of an animal because animals have feelings.
What is codeline baseline and mainline?
Some people argue that developers should not be involved in testing their own code but all testing should be done by a separate team. Give arguments for and against.
Arguments for an against genetic testing?
DNA is a fact of life, you can argue its uses but not itself
What are the arguments against medical testing on animals?
If we accept that animals can suffer and that there should be justice in the world, then it is obvious that no one has no right to inflict suffering or illness or disfigurement on any innocent creature.
Does Ryan Wilson's experience support animal testing?
Yes Ryan wilson does support animal testing.
What are some arguments against cosmetic testing on animals?
No one has a moral right to bring suffering on any creature especially for the sake of making money. The testing causes the animals pain, the reason for which escapes the animal because of their lack of intelligence. That does NOT make them increasingly tolerant to pain.
What are the arguments for and against Human medical testing?
One argument against is that it involves experimenting with the health and safety of human beings. An argument for is that although effects of drugs on animals may be similar to their effects on humans, some effects may be specific to human beings only. Another is that testing drugs on human beings may result in unexpected negative results for the subjects.
What are religious arguments against animal testing?
Many cultures think some animals are sacred for example: Egyptians: Cats Hindu/ Indian : Beef and they don't eat anything from the animals either so if something was sacred to us then we wouldn't want things tested on them.
What are people testing when they scratch a diamond against glass?
they are testing if its real or not <3
What is a good title for a persuasive essay on animal testing and you are against it?
is the testing really worth it
What if the results do not support the hypothesis you were testing?
Then explain why it was wrong
This is an argument that makes an opposing point to another argument?
Opposing arguments can foster healthy debate and lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the issue at hand. By critically evaluating opposing viewpoints, individuals can strengthen their own arguments and potentially reach more balanced conclusions. It is through this process of testing ideas against counterarguments that a more nuanced perspective can be developed.
