answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

One argument against is that it involves experimenting with the health and safety of human beings. An argument for is that although effects of drugs on animals may be similar to their effects on humans, some effects may be specific to human beings only. Another is that testing drugs on human beings may result in unexpected negative results for the subjects.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the arguments for and against Human medical testing?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are arguments for and against testing on animals?

Some of the arguments for are that it saves human lives, humans are superior to animals and the animals do not know that its happening. Some of the arguments against animal testing are its cruel to animals, animals have rights as well, you should treat animals the same as humans and theres alternatives out there to animal testing. On one side you have the for the other against. The opposing position against probably says it is nessacary for the animal testing because animals are about the same as humans. On the against position animal testing is wrong because it can cause the animal deadly pain and diseases. But I think there should be a human in the place of an animal because animals have feelings.


What are the arguments for and against a teleological explanation of the origins of human language?

[object Object]


What are the arguments against internet voting?

Some of the arguments against internet voting include security risks, electronic and human errors.


Why is animal testing allowed?

To allow for medical progress in order to benefit human nature. It may be evil, but a necessary evil


What tools are in the medical arsenal against human viral diseases?

1. A healthy immune system.


What are the advantages of human testing?

There are quite a few advantages of human testing. By testing on humans doctors and researchers are able to directly see side affects.


Why is drug testing on humans good?

Human drug testing is good because it allows scientists to see the effects of the drugs how to use them and how not to use them. There isn't really a big risk in human drug testing, how many people do u know how have died of human drug testing ??


The testing method of observation investigates human behavior through?

The testing method of observation investigates human behavior through direct monitoring and recording of actions, reactions, and interactions in real-life or controlled settings. This method involves carefully watching subjects without interference or manipulation to gather data on their natural behaviors and responses.


How often do you get in arguments?

Arguing is part of the human condition. Some individuals seem to get into many arguments while others seem to avoid them.


What arguments would you use to convince a friend that the lives of human beings are dependent on solar energy?

What arguments would you use to convince a friend that the lives of human beings are dependent on solar energy?


What were Kelsen's arguments against natural law?

Natural law theory exaggerates the relation of law and morality. Positive law is a reaction against particularly that aspect of Natural law theory. It insists on a distinction between human law, which they call positive law and moral and scientific laws. Human laws are posits of human society while scientific laws are independent of what we take them to be.


Why is testing animals for medical advancement a cruel and unfair thing to do?

Because it can cause injury, sickness, and death. The places they are kept are sometimes unsanitary, and human medicine was not meant for animals to eat.