No. For a sentence to contain a direct object, the verb must be transitive (a type of action verb). "Was" is a linking verb, and "furious" is the subject complement. Subject complements and direct objects are not the same thing.
No, the verb "was" in the sentence "George was furious" does not have a direct object. "Furious" is a predicate adjective that describes the subject "George."
c. gerorge was furious
The direct object in the sentence "His father walks with a limp" is "a limp."
In grammar, technique can serve as either a direct object or an indirect object, depending on how it is used in a sentence. For example, in the sentence "She taught me a new technique," "me" is the indirect object and "a new technique" is the direct object.
In the sentence "Your visit to the museum was educational", "visit" is the direct object. An indirect object would typically receive the direct object, such as in the sentence "I gave her a gift" where "her" is the indirect object receiving the direct object "gift".
The direct object in the sentence is "a notebook," as it is the object that is being bought by Susie.
c. gerorge was furious
The verb does not have a direct object in the sentence, "She is insecure."
There is no direct object in that sentence.
I believe the answer would be D. They won the game. "They" is the subject, "won" is the verb, and "game" is the direct object.
The direct object in the sentence "His father walks with a limp" is "a limp."
D They won the game.
There is no direct object in that sentence.
There is no direct object in this sentence.
In the sentence 'you have her a surprise gift', 'her' is an indirect object. 'Gift' is the direct object in that sentence.
Yes, and very often. Example: "This sentence has a direct object." where object is the D.O.
That sentence does not contain a direct object.
"song" is the direct object in that sentence.