Want this question answered?
bismuth 210 decays by beta decay to polonium 210 that decays by alpha decay to lead 206
Radium-226 does not decay by beta decay. It decays by alpha decay to radon-222.
give off nuclear radiation
Because the less protons are in an atom the quicker it decays.
Oxygen-15 does not decay by alpha decay. It decays by beta+ decay to Nitrogen-15, giving off a positron and an electron neutrino. 715O --> (beta+)--> (t1/2 = 122.24 seconds) --> 615N + e+ + ve
In physics, an alpha emitter is a radioactive substance which decays by emitting alpha particles.
Alpha and beta decays.
bismuth 210 decays by beta decay to polonium 210 that decays by alpha decay to lead 206
Radium-226 does not decay by beta decay. It decays by alpha decay to radon-222.
give off nuclear radiation
Gold never decays by alpha emission, it either decays by -beta, +beta, K capture, or gamma emission depending on isotope.Natural gold is isotopically pure gold-197, which is stable.
Uranium-239 does NOT decay by alpha decay, it decays only by beta and gammadecay.
That's what an atom emits when it decays.
Because the less protons are in an atom the quicker it decays.
224
Uranium-237 decays by beta- decay to Neptunium-237 with a half-life of 6.75 days, emitting a W- boson which then decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino... 92237U --> 93237Np + (W- --> e- + v-e)
If this is meat as in radioactive decay, then no. Whether a radioactive source decays by alpha or beta decay depends on the number of neutrons compared to protons it has in its nucleus. As the proton and neutron numbers get to around 100, there is a bit of an overlap. Before this, particles decay by beta emission, and after this, alpha. Having said that, there are points where there is both types, however in terms of increasing nucleon numbers, beta comes before alpha radiation, so in answer to the question, no.