answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because it was an unusual case of a slave trying to sue for his freedom retrospectively - that is, he had been taken on to free soil, and then back into slave country.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

They went and payed thier way to the civil war

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Dred Scott v Sanford in 1857?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What day did the Dred Scott case end?

The Dred Scot v. Sandford, (1857) arguments concluded on February 18, 1857, and the US Supreme Court announced its decision March 6, 1857.Case Citation:Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)


Which court case did the Supreme Court declare the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional?

Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)The court case was Dred Scott v. Sandford, in 1857.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


In what state did Dred Scott live when his case went before the US Supreme Court?

Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)Dred Scott lived in St. Louis, Missouri.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What are facts about the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?


What yeard did dred Scott suprteme court case is decided?

Dred Scott v. Sandford : 1857 .


Was Dred Scott ever freed from slavery?

Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)Yes. Although Dred Scott lost his case before the US Supreme Court, Taylor Blow, son of Dred Scott's former owner, Peter Blow, purchased the Scott family's emancipation from John Sanford on May 26, 1857. Dred Scott found work as a porter in a St. Louis, Missouri, hotel, but died of tuberculosis (a lung disease) in September 1858, little more than a year after gaining his freedom.


Why was Dred Scott not able to write his own statements for the court during his trial?

Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)Dred Scott was illiterate because slaves didn't have an opportunity for a formal education.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What supreme court ruling said that blacks could not become citizens of the US?

Dred Scott v. Sandford,* 60 US 393 (1857)*Sandford is misspelled in the court documents; the respondent's real last name was Sanford.


What landmark Supreme Court decisions was a prime factor leading to the Civil War?

Dred Scott v. Sanford


What repealed the Dred Scott case of 1857?

"Repealed" applies to legislation, not to precedents set by legal cases. The Thirteenth Amendment (1865), making slavery illegal, overturned the precedent set in the Dred Scottcase.Case Citation:Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)


What court case did a slave try to sue for his freedom after his master died?

The court case was Dred Scott v. Sandford in 1857. Dred Scott, a slave, sued for his freedom in the United States Supreme Court after his master died, but the court ruled against him, stating that slaves were property and not entitled to citizenship.


What was the supreme court decision of dred Scott v sanford?

The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) ruled that African Americans were not citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. Additionally, the Court declared that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, as it violated the Fifth Amendment rights of slave owners by depriving them of their property.