Serfs, who were little better than slaves!
MoreI would have to disagree that they were little better than slaves. For example, they had a right to a place to live and fields to farm, and could not be evicted without due cause. If the land was sold, the new owner had to respect their rights to use it. They had a right to be protected. In many places, the reeve was elected by the serfs. And in many places, if they left, they were considered free after a year.Please see the links below.
Serfs were legally tied to the land during medieval times.
knights
yes they were they owned all the farms in the town of guniik. they werent very smart with it though!
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
Surfs were peasants or serfs in medieval times who were tied to the land and owned by a lord. They were not free and had to provide labor, pay taxes, and give a portion of their crops to the lord in exchange for protection and the right to live on the land.
Serfs, who were basically slaves tied down to the land and forced to work. They were the poorest and lowest class in society.
Being "bound to the soil" meant that you farmed land on a particular manor and it was illegal for you to go farm elsewhere or to take up another way of making a living. You were tied to that land.
You are probably thinking of a serf. Serfs were basically like slaves; they were tied to the land and forced to work. They were like peasants but they did not have freedom, peasants had freedom.
wil misty get tied up like 11 times and ash get tied up 15 0r 20 times
nobles owned land, peasants were tied to land
serf
Serf
Yes.