A lethal dose is around $35, which saves a lot of money for insurance companies.
it saves trasport costs it saves time to the company
210935769549 %
There is no doubt that surgeries for gastric bypass cost a lot of money. While many insurances do cover some or all of the costs associated with the surgery, many are left with a bill and a payment plan that is often discouraging and frustrating. Still it is important to remember that, while the bypass costs money, it also saves money in the long run on medical bills. When people who struggle with obesity lose weight, they become healthier and less likely to require such things as diabetic care, cardiac procedures, medications for blood pressure and cholesterol, and a lower bill at the grocery store as well.
To keep the water hot longer. Saves on heating costs.
You don't save it you just press the button on the iPod and it saves automatically.
Improves organizational cash management Enhances unit readiness Saves administrative costs incurred
A wireless desktop can cut costs for a business in the following ways. It facilitates ease of use and convenience, therefore, cutting time and manpower, and as a result, saves the business money.
OpinionNo one can claim to truly know whether, or in what circumstances, euthanasia is moral. So, while it is possible to try to answer this question by discussing the moral issues, it is not easy to say whether euthenasia is ever morally supportable. Of course, euthanasia should be differentiated from simple removal of life support from a patient who has already effectively succumbed. The Churches, on good grounds, oppose euthanasia in all circumstances. We all regard life as sacred, whether in the religious or a secular sense. The Church position also helps guard against terminating an elderly person's life out of greed or other improper motives.Others believe that euthanasia is not only permissible but proper, providing it is voluntary, based on full information, and is restricted to those suffering serious pain and close to death. Like that of the Churches, this view is also understandable and defensible.What few would support, is assisted suicide for reasons other than to end great suffering of the terminally ill.OpinionI suggest that is a matter of (moral) fact. (There are people who (explicitly or implicitly) believe that moral truth does not exist… but they usually object if you try to kill them.) Conversely, some situations can constitute ethical dilemmas; that is, there are moral and ethical reasons pointing in opposing directions, because of elements in those situations. (For example, (glossing over the difficulties) euthanasia is done (or not) where there is a moral conflict between • death and • pain plus absence of proper life.)Even where there is an ethical dilemma, I suggest that this can still be described and quantified. (Of course, it is possible to have an ethical dilemma wherein the result is 50:50.)Conversely again, it is reasonable to note moral principles that are part of the ethical dilemma of euthanasia, and analyse how much moral weight they have.I should mention, while I'm here, that it has been accepted medical practice, for many centuries, to not intervene to uselessly prolong the life of someone who was dying. The point is that the current term "euthanasia" is often used in a way that ignores this distinction.
saves long-term maintenance costs and may reduce some major problems in the future.
mother flippin, improves organization cash management enhances unit readiness saves administrative costs incurred
A,b,d improves organization cash management enhances unit readiness saves administrative costs incurred
because the medical center saves lives and provides us with medicines and cures diseases for the ill without them we would all be in a bad time now