False. "Collectivization" is attributed for the soviet famine in the early 1930's, killing millions.
Collectivization of farms Relocation of peasants
No, quite the opposite.
Collectivization of farms Relocation of peasants
Propaganda portrayed peasants as enemies of the state and obstacles to progress in the collectivization initiative. It dehumanized them, labeling them as kulaks or capitalist exploiters. This distorted perception fueled aggression and ruthless actions against peasants, including confiscation of their land and resources, forced collectivization, and persecution.
During the Great Leap Forward, Chinese peasants largely resisted the collectivization of farms, which aimed to consolidate individual landholdings into large collective farms. Many peasants were skeptical of the policies, leading to widespread discontent and reluctance to cooperate. This resistance was exacerbated by poor planning and the resulting famine, which caused immense suffering. Ultimately, the harsh realities of collectivization led to significant dissatisfaction and contributed to the eventual abandonment of the policy.
Peasants were allowed to keep a small private plot of land for their own food production.
I assume you are referring to the early days of the Soviet Union. They were shot or sent to Siberia.
beatingsprisonexecutionsiberian gulagconfiscation of seed grain (so that they had nothing to plant next year)forced starvationetc.
The Gulag class, which consisted of wealthy peasants or kulaks in Soviet Russia, opposed collectivization because it threatened their private property and independence. They were forced to give up their land and livestock to join collective farms, leading to economic losses and loss of status. Many resorted to sabotage or resistance against the forced collectivization.
peasants responsibilities are everyone does whatever king better than you damon wants
Were everyone peasants, there would be no peasants.
There are no "richer" peasants. There was nobility and then there was everyone else.