answersLogoWhite

0

In many books in recent years, the info and discussions show that king john was a good leader in war, good at improvisation, good at thinking and good strategic.

The monkish chronicles in 1206 state that he was a very bad but this information was biased as the monks didn't like him as he was mean to the pope and increased taxes.

The portrayal of king John in Robin Hood shows his bad side which may or may not be true.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What john Cabot successful?

Sailed to the Newfoundland and claimed it for the king of England.


Why was King Prester John a legend?

It is likely that the story of King Prester John was a legend. No physical evidence of his kingdom has ever been found.


What were all of john Cabot skills?

he was successful for sailing to newfoundland and claimed it for the king


What is King John successful at?

Preventing any children of British royalty from being named John ever again.


What evidence is there that Stephen King killed John Lennon?

Stephen king is a famous horror book author not a murder. John Lennon was assassinated by the U.S. government.


Why did King John kill arthur?

The previous answer is completely false. There is no EVIDENCE to suggest that King John had any involvement in the disappearance of Arthur. It is only speculation. The most popular rumor is that King John had the boy assassinated by Lord William de Braose.


What was the evidence that King John made mistakes?

king John to some was great and to others not so great. King John did make horrible mistakes in the past such as: Leaving the country a mess when he was off the throne.A good thing about King John is that he fed 1000 paupers every year. He made England richer by introducing new money systems to England.I hope this much information helps you.Written bySurrayia


Was John Hancock successful?

John Hancock was a successful silversmith, merchant, and smuggler.


Who king John?

who is king john


Why was William the Conqueror a successful king?

He was a successful king because he conquered England and invented a feudal system


What evidence does the artticle provide that John was not a very good king?

He MAY have murdered his nephew and he lost wars and lots of England's land in France


Why was some of the evidence of King John unreliable?

Because of how unpredictable he was and all in which he did during his reign before his royal power was limited by the Magna Carta.