It left the central government weak because the states maintained a majority of the power.
No. When they left the union they assumed that the English factories would help them because they needed cotton, but the English had enough cotton bales in storage that they could go without buying any for awhile.
The Confederation government was weak in the area of trade relations
The Articles of Confederation was a weak government. Shays Rebellion demonstrated this fact when government authorities could not decide whether the state or the national government should put down the revolt. Larger states wanted to do away with the Articles of Confederation because they thought the central government needed to be stronger while smaller states wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation because they were afraid of having a strong central government.
The battle about whether the Articles of Confederation or the Constitution should be the Law of the Land.
Yes AND no, depending of which angle you are asking from. It is no, due to the fact that the Articles of Confederation created/built a very weak government, which is the complete contrast of what Federalism is; which it's based upon a strong centralized government. It is yes if you are asking whether or not it helped in the rise of Federalism. When it created a weak U.S. government in which nothing was properly functioning as it should be. Debts were not being paid off, the rights given were too vague to interpret, and certain states were given more power than others. Thus, it created alarm and added onto the support of Federalism, the idea of a stronger central government. The question is a bit vague on which direction it's heading so I hope this answer helps you out.
call this number to find out Phone Number: 202-456-1111
Basically, the angry farmers who were rebelling posed a threat to all citizens. This raised more awareness to their debt situations. Wikipedia puts it best, "Ultimately, the uprising was the climax of a series of events of the 1780s that convinced a powerful group of Americans that the national government needed to be stronger so that it could create uniform economic policies and protect property owners from infringements on their rights by local majorities." People started to question whether state sovereignty was the best form of government for the country.
You need to answer this question because we don’t do homework and your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills and how well you understood the lesson. Not ours.
The Articles of Confederation was a weak government. Shays Rebellion demonstrated this fact when government authorities could not decide whether the state or the national government should put down the revolt. Larger states wanted to do away with the Articles of Confederation because they thought the central government needed to be stronger while smaller states wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation because they were afraid of having a strong central government.
Whether each state should have one vote or voting should be based on population they also disagreed about whether the national government or the individual states should control the land of the Western Appalachians.
The delegates disagreed about whether each state should have one vote or voting should be based on population they also disagreed about whether the national government or the individual states should control the land of the western Appalachians.
Two of the key issues during the Constitutional Convention were slavery and how the president would be elected. One was decided and one was tabled.
Surprising agreement
Explain how you know whether an estimate of a product is an overestimate or an underestimate?
becasue he don't want to betray AmericaThe US has diplomatic relations with the certain countries of the world. If the government of one of these countries is overthrown, the US has to decide whether the new government is really in power and will stay in power and is recognized by the citizens of the country as its rightful government. The president also has to consider treaties and alliances that involve the country in question and whether the new government can be trusted to honor these treaties and alliances. The opinions and feelings of the other nations allied to the US must also be considered.
Did the british governments overreact to the colonal protesis .by issuing the intolerable
I couldn't find anything on whether he was for or against confederation but since he was partner to Sir John A. Macdonald I would assume that his views were he same as Macdonald's.
An insurance carrier, whether a private carrier or a government program, is referred to as
difficult